United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Schedule 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.)
 
Filed by the registrantx                            Filed by a party other than the registrant   ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨
Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

xDefinitive Proxy Statement

¨Definitive Additional Materials

¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

Applied Energetics, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

xNo fee required

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 

 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:


 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 


 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:


 (5)Total fee paid:


¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

 (1)Amount previously paid:


 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:


 (3)Filing Party:


 (4)Date Filed:

 



APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
3590 EAST COLUMBIA STREET
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85714
 
May 14, 2008August 15, 2011

Dear Fellow Stockholders:Stockholder:

AnYou are cordially invited to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that will be held on Wednesday, June 11, 2008Monday, October 3, 2011 at 10:9:00 A.M., local time, at our corporate offices at 3590 East Columbia Street, Tucson, Arizona 85714.
As permitted by rules adopted by the officesUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission, we are mailing a notice to many of Blank Rome LLP, 405 Lexington Avenue - 24 th Floor, New York, New York 10174.our stockholders instead of a paper copy of this proxy statement and our 2010 Annual Report to Stockholders.  The notice contains instructions on how to access those documents over the Internet.  The notice also contains instructions on how each of those stockholders can receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, including this proxy statement, our 2010 Annual Report to Stockholders and a proxy card.  We believe that this process will provide our stockholders with easier access to these proxy materials, reduce the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials and conserve environmental resources.
 
The Noticenotice of Annual Meetingannual meeting and Proxy Statement,proxy statement, which follow, describe the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting.
meeting.  Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. After reading the enclosed Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, Iannual meeting, we urge you to complete, sign, dateread this material carefully and returnencourage you to vote promptly.  You may vote your shares via a toll-free telephone number or over the Internet.  If you received a proxy card by mail, you may vote by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the envelope provided.  If the addressInstructions regarding all three methods of voting are contained on the accompanying material is incorrect, please advise our Transfer Agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, in writing, at 17 Battery Place, New York, New York 10004.proxy card.
 
The Annual MeetingIf you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, you will need to present a government issued picture identification, such as a passport or driver’s license, to enter our corporate offices.  Access to the secured portion of our facility will not be held solely to tabulate the votes cast and report on the results of the voting on those matters listed in the accompanying proxy statement. No presentations or other business matters are planned for the meeting.permitted.
 
Your vote is very important,Thank you and we will appreciate a prompt return of your signed proxy card.I look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
 
Cordially,


Dana A. MarshallJames M. Feigley
Chairman of the Board Chief Executive Officer and President



APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
3590 EAST COLUMBIA STREET
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85714


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD JUNE 11, 2008OCTOBER 3, 2011

To the Stockholders of Applied Energetics, Inc.:
 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Applied Energetics, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on Wednesday, June 11, 2008Monday, October 3, 2011 at 10:9:00 A.M. local time at our corporate offices at 3590 East Columbia Street, Tucson, Arizona 85714 to consider and vote upon the offices of Blank Rome LLP, 405 Lexington Avenue - 24 th Floor, New York, New York 10174 forproposals below, as explained more fully in the following purposes:accompanying proxy statement:
 
(i)To           A proposal to elect two Class I directors to hold office until the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and one Class II director to hold office until the 20092014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified; and
 
(ii)To transact such          A proposal to ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s independent registered accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011; and
(iii)         Any other business as maymatters properly comebrought before the meeting, orincluding approval of any adjournment or adjournments thereof.postponement of the meeting.
 
Only stockholders of record on the books of the Company at the close of business on May 9, 2008August 11, 2011 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
 
A copy of the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2007,2010, which contains financial statements, accompanies this Notice and the attached Proxy Statement.  You may vote your shares via a toll-free telephone number or over the Internet.  If you received a proxy card by mail, you may vote by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the envelope provided.  Whether or not you attend the meeting, it is important your shares be represented and voted.
Your board of directors believes that the election of the nominees specified in the accompanying proxy statement as directors at the annual meeting is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and, accordingly, unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” such nominees.
 
May 14, 2008August 15, 2011By order of the Board of Directors
  
 
Dana A. MarshallJames M. Feigley
 Chairman of the Board Chief Executive Officer and President


YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT.  WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE ENSURE YOU TAKE THE TIME TO CAST YOUR VOTE.
PLEASE FILL IN, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN
YOU MAY VOTE BY SUBMITTING YOUR PROXY BY TELEPHONE, THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED FOR THAT PURPOSE, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES. THE PROXY MAY BE REVOKED AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO EXERCISE, ANDINTERNET OR MAIL.  IF YOU ARE PRESENT ATA REGISTERED STOCKHOLDER AND ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY IF YOU WISH, REVOKE YOUR PROXY AT THAT TIME AND EXERCISE THE RIGHTVOTE YOUR SHARES IN PERSON.  IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES THROUGH A BANK OR BROKER AND WANT TO VOTE YOUR SHARES PERSONALLY.IN PERSON AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR BANK OR BROKER TO OBTAIN A LEGAL PROXY.
 



PROXY STATEMENT
 
PROXY STATEMENT
APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
 
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD JUNE 11, 2008OCTOBER 3, 2011
 
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Applied Energetics, Inc. (“Applied Energetics” or the “Company”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, June 11, 2008Monday, October 3, 2011 (the “Annual Meeting”), including any adjournmentadjournments or adjournmentspostponements thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Meeting.
Management intends to mail this proxy statement, the accompanying form of proxy and annual report to stockholders on or about May 15, 2008.
 
Proxies in the accompanying form, duly executed and returned to the management of the Company and not revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting. Any proxy given by a stockholder pursuant to such solicitation may be revoked by the stockholder at any time prior to the voting of the proxy by a subsequently dated proxy, by written notification to the Secretary of the Company, or by personally withdrawing the proxy at the meeting and voting in person.
 
The address and telephone number of the principal executive offices of the Company are:
 
3590 East Columbia Street
Tucson, Arizona 85714
Telephone: (520) 628-7415





TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Page
Page
GENERAL INFORMATION2
Outstanding Stock and Voting Rights.2
Voting Procedures.2
1 
PROPOSAL I: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS2
3 
STOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE5
 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE7
Director Independence7
Board Meetings7
Committees of the Board of Directors7
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct8
Communications with the Board8
Consideration of Director Nominees8
Deadline and Procedures for Submitting Board Nominations9
Litigation9
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION10
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS10
Executive Compensation Philosophy10
Compensation Committee10
Elements of Compensation11
Base Salary12
Cash Bonus12
Long-Term Incentives13
Severance and Change in Control Agreements14
Other Benefit Plans and Programs15
Employment Agreements for Named Executive Officers15
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE16
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS17
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END18
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROL19
Executive Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control19
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION20
Compensation Committee Interlocks And Insider Participation:21
Compensation Committee Report:21
 
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE:21
Transactions With Related Parties21
18 
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS22
18 
Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT2219
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
PROPOSAL II:  RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
2214
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR NEXT ANNUAL MEETING19
OTHER INFORMATION21
 
-i-



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Outstanding Stock and Voting Rights.GENERAL INFORMATION
 
OnlyNotice of Electronic Availability of Proxy Statement and Annual Report
As permitted by rules adopted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (sometimes referred to as the SEC), Applied Energetics is making this proxy statement and its annual report available to its stockholders electronically via the Internet.  On August 15, 2011, we mailed a notice to our stockholders containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our annual report and vote online.  If you received a notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail.  The notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy statement and annual report.  The notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy over the Internet.  If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the notice.
Questions and Answers About The Proposals to be Voted Upon and The Voting Procedures
Q.What am I voting on?
A.You are being asked to vote on the proposal to elect as Class I directors the two nominees recommended by the Company’s Board of Directors and named in this proxy statement (John F. Levy and Mark J. Lister) to serve as such commencing immediately following our 2010 annual meeting and until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2014.
In addition, you may be asked to consider and vote upon other matters that may properly come before the annual meeting, including approval of any adjournment or postponement of the meeting
Q.Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?
A.Common stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 11, 2011, the record date, are entitled to vote on each of the proposals at the annual meeting.  Each share of common stock entitles the holder thereof to cast one vote per each share held by such stockholder on the record date with respect to each proposal.
Q.How do I vote?
A.Stockholders can vote in person at the annual meeting or by proxy.  There are three ways to vote by proxy:
·
By telephone — You can vote by telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions on the proxy card;
·
By Internet — You can vote over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com by following the instructions on the proxy card; or
·
By mail — If you received your proxy materials by mail, you can vote by mail by signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card.
Telephone and Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at the close of business11:59 p.m. (EDT) on May 9, 2008 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were issued and outstanding 80,587,762 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, $.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), the Company’s only class of voting securities, and 950,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”). Each share of Common Stock entitles the holder thereof to cast one vote on each matter submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting. The holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock do not have any vote rights, except as required by law, and, accordingly, are not entitled to vote on the election of directors.October 2, 2011.
 
Voting Procedures.
AtIf your shares are held in the Annual Meeting, the two nominees for election as Class I directors and the nominee for election as Class II director who receive the highest number of affirmative votes of shares of person or by proxy will be elected, provided a quorum is present. All other matters to come before the Annual Meeting will be decided by the affirmative votename of a majoritybank, broker or other holder of the shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter presented in person or by proxy, provided a quorum is present. A quorum is present if at least a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. It is currently anticipated that votesrecord, you will be counted and certified by an Inspector of Election who is currently expected to be either an employee of the Company or its transfer agent. In accordance with Delaware law, abstentions and “broker non-votes” (i.e. proxies from brokers or nominees indicating that such persons have not receivedreceive instructions from the beneficial owner or other persons entitledholder of record.  You must follow the instructions of the holder of record in order for your shares to be voted.  Telephone and Internet voting also will be offered to stockholders owning shares through certain banks and brokers.  If your shares are not registered in your own name and you plan to vote your shares as to a matter with respect to which the brokers or nominees do not have discretionary power to vote) will be treated as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. For purposes of determining approval of a matter presentedin person at the annual meeting, abstentions will be deemed presentyou should contract your broker or agent to obtain a legal proxy or broker’s proxy card and entitledbring it to vote and will, therefore, have the same legal effect as a vote “against” a matter presented at the meeting. Broker non-votes will be deemed not entitledannual meeting in order to vote on the subject matter as to which the non-vote is indicated. Broker non-votes will have no legal effect on the vote on the election of directors or on any other particular matter which requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting.vote.
 
The officers and directors of the Company who, in the aggregate own approximately 15.3% of the outstanding common stock of the Company on the Record Date, have indicated their intent to vote in favor of the nominees for director nominated by the Company.
Q.How may I revoke or change my vote?
 
The enclosed proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions thereon. Unless otherwise stated, all shares represented by such proxy will be voted as instructed. Proxies may be revoked as noted above.
A.You have the right to revoke your proxy any time before the meeting by (a) notifying Applied Energetics’ corporate secretary of your revocation or (b) returning a later-dated proxy.  The last vote received chronologically will supersede any prior vote.  You may also revoke your proxy by voting in person at the annual meeting.  Attendance at the meeting, without voting at the meeting, will not in and of itself serve as a revocation of your proxy.


 
The entire cost of soliciting proxies, including the costs of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing this Proxy Statement, the proxy and any additional soliciting material furnished to stockholders, will be borne by the Company. Arrangements will be made with brokerage houses, banks and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to send proxies and proxy materials to the beneficial owners of stock, and the Company expects to reimburse such persons for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. Proxies may also be solicited by directors, officers or employees of the Company in person or by telephone, telegram or other means. No additional compensation will be paid to such individuals for these services.
Q.What does it mean if I receive more than one notice or set of proxy materials.
 
A.It may mean that you are the registered holder of shares in more than one account.  You may call our transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, at 212-509-4000, if you have any questions regarding the share information or your address appearing on the notice or proxy materials.
Q.Who will count the votes?
A.It is expected that either an employee of the Company or its counsel will tabulate the votes and act as the inspector of election.
Q.What constitutes a quorum?
A.A majority of the outstanding shares, present or represented by proxy, of Applied Energetics’ common stock will constitute a quorum for the annual meeting.  As of the record date, there were 91,371,192 shares of Applied Energetics common stock, $.001 par value per share, issued and outstanding.
Q.
How many votes are needed for Proposal I the election of the two Class I directors?
A.Assuming a quorum is present, the two Class I directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting, meaning the two nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected as directors.  Only votes cast for a nominee will be counted, except that a properly executed proxy that does not specify a vote with respect to the nominees will be voted for the two nominees whose names are printed on the proxy card (John F. Levy and Mark J. Lister).  Because the vote on this proposal is determined by a plurality of the votes cast, neither abstentions nor broker non-votes (as described below) will have any effect on the election of directors.
Q.How many votes are needed to approve the other Proposal?
A.Assuming a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of the Company’s common stock represented at the annual meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required for Proposal II to pass.  As described below, for this proposal, abstentions and broker-non votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Q.What happens if I abstain from voting?
A.If an executed proxy card is returned and the stockholder has explicitly abstained from voting on any proposal, the shares represented by the proxy will be considered present at the annual meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum.  In addition, while they will not count as votes cast in favor of the proposal, they will count as votes cast on the proposal.  As a result, other than with respect to Proposal I, which will be determined by a plurality of the votes cast, an abstention on a proposal will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Q.What is a “broker non-vote”?
A.A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker submits a proxy that does not indicate a vote for one or more of the proposals because the broker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner on how to vote on such proposals and does not have discretionary authority to vote in the absence of instructions.  While broker non-votes will be counted for the purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the annual meeting, they will not be considered to have voted on any of the proposals on which such instructions have been withheld.  In the case of any proposal requiring a majority vote in favor of the proposal, they will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Q.Who bears the cost of soliciting of proxies?
A.The entire cost of soliciting proxies, including the costs of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing the notice and, as applicable, this proxy statement, the proxy and any additional soliciting material furnished to stockholders, will be borne by us.  In addition, arrangements will be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to send proxies and proxy materials to the beneficial owners of stock, and we may reimburse such persons for their expenses.

-2-

PROPOSAL I: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
 
The Company’s By-Laws provide that the Board of Directors of the Company is divided into three classes (Class I, Class II and Class III). At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, directors constituting one class are elected for a three-year term. At this year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, two (2) Class I directors will be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2011 and one (1) Class II director will be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2009.2014. It is the intention of the Board of Directors to nominate Dana A. MarshallMr. John F. Levy and James A. McDivittMr. Mark J. Lister as Class I directors and General James M. Feigley as Class II director.directors. Each director will be elected to serve until a successor is elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal.
 
At this year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the proxies granted by stockholders will be voted individually for the election, as directors of the Company, of the persons listed below, unless a proxy specifies that it is not to be voted in favor of a nominee for director. In the event either or both of the nominees listed below shall be unable to serve, it is intended that the proxy will be voted for such other nominees as are designated by the Board of Directors. Each of the persons named below has indicated to the Board of Directors that he will be available to serve.
-2-

 
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERSSTOCKHOLDERS VOTE FORFOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES SPECIFIED BELOW.
 
The following information is with respect to the nominees for election at this Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
 
CLASS I DIRECTORSDIRECTOR
(To be Elected)
(New Term Expires in 2011)2014)

Dana A. Marshall:John F. Levy: Dana A. Marshall, 49,  John F. Levy has been oura director of the company since June, 2009.  Mr. Levy serves as Chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of our Audit and Strategic Planning Committee.  Since May 2005, Mr. Levy has served as the Board since November 2007, Chief Executive Officer Presidentof Board Advisory, a consulting firm that advises public companies in the areas of corporate governance, corporate compliance, financial reporting and Director since Augustfinancial strategies.  Mr. Levy served as the Interim Chief Financial Officer from November 2005 to March 2006 and was appointed Assistant Secretaryof Universal Food & Beverage Company, which filed a voluntary petition under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Act on August 31, 2007.  From November 1997 to May 2005, Mr. Levy served as Chief Financial Officer of MediaBay, Inc., a NASDAQ listed company in February 2008.and provider of spoken word audio content.  While at MediaBay, he also served for a period as its Vice Chairman.  Mr. Marshall has over 20Levy is a certified public accountant with nine years of experience inwith the lasernational public accounting firms of Ernst & Young, Laventhol & Horwath and optical technologies in the aerospace and defense industries.Grant Thornton.  Mr. MarshallLevy is a member of the Board of Directors of Research-Electro Optics, a privately held company. Mr. Marshall served as Vice President, Optical Systems SBU of Zygo Corporation, a publicly traded company, from September 2004 through March 2006. From June 2003 through August 2005, Mr. Marshall owneddirector and operated Infusafe LLC, a partner in a venture to develop and market designs for pharmaceutical packaging, and from June 2001 to September 2003, Mr. Marshall managed his income properties through Cricklewood Realty LLC. From 1993 through 2000, Mr. Marshall was Chief Executive Officer, President andnon-executive Chairman of the Board of Cutting Edge Optronics,Applied Minerals, Inc., an exploration stage natural resource and mining company, a director, lead director and chair of the audit committee of Gilman Ciocia, Inc., a developer and manufacturer of high power solid state and semiconductor lasers which he founded in 1993, developed and sold to TRW Incorporated in 2004. Before founding Cutting Edge Optronics, Mr. Marshall’s career included substantial positions in strategicpublicly traded financial planning and program management, at major defense companies, including serving as Program Manager, Laserstax preparation firm, and Electronic Systems Divisiona director of McDonnell Douglas Corporation. PriorBrightpoint, Inc., a publicly traded company that provides supply chain solutions to joining McDonnell Douglas,leading stakeholders in the wireless industry.  Mr. Marshall beganLevy was formerly a director of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. and PNG Ventures, Inc.  Mr. Levy has authored The 21st Century Director: Legal and Ethical Responsibilities of Board Members, a course on the ethical and legal responsibilities of board members initially presented to various state accounting societies.  Mr. Levy has a B.S. degree in Economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and received his defense industry careerM.B.A. from St. Joseph's University in 1982 at General Dynamics Corporation, and rose to become Manager of Strategic Planning at Corporate Headquarters.Philadelphia.
 
James A. McDivitt:Mark J. Lister: James A. McDivitt, 78,  Mark J. Lister has served as a member of our Board of Directors since February 2006.June, 2009.  Mr. McDivittLister serves as the Chairman of our lead independent director,Strategic Planning Committee.  Since November, 2006, Mr. Lister has been President of StratTechs, Inc., a consulting firm he founded which specializes in brokering technology within the Defense, Intelligence and Homeland Security Government markets.  Mr. Lister recently completed service on the Secretary of the Navy Advisory Panel and formerly served as Chairman of the Naval Research Advisory Committee.  From January 1992 to June 2006, Mr. Lister was employed by the Sarnoff Corporation where he most recently served as Senior Vice President of Government Operations.  While at Sarnoff, from 2001 to 2006, Mr. Lister served as Managing Director of the Rosettex Technology and Ventures Group, a joint venture of Sarnoff Corporation and SRI International for which he was a founder, and from 1996 to 2001, Mr. Lister served as Executive Director of the National Information Display Laboratory.  From 1987 to 1992, he served as Director, Advanced Development and Applications in the Research and Development Group of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Air Force for Space.  Mr. Lister’s government career began at the Naval Research Laboratory where he served as a researcher in the Space Applications Branch from 1977 to 1987.  Mr. Lister has a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Drexel University, a B.S. in Mathematics from St. Vincent College and a MEA from George Washington University.

-3-

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following information is with respect to incumbent directors in Class II and Class III of the Board of Directors who are not nominees for election at this Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
CLASS II DIRECTORS
(Term Expires in 2012)
James M. Feigley:  James M. Feigley has served as a member of our Compensation Committee and our Audit CommitteeBoard of Directors since June 2008, and as Chairman since April of 2009.  Mr. Feigley serves as a member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Strategic Planning Committee. Mr. McDivitt currently serves as a director of Silicon Graphics Inc., a publicly traded company. From 1981 until his retirement in 1995, Mr. McDivitt was employed at Rockwell International Corporation, most recently as its Senior Vice President, Government Operations and International. Mr. McDivitt joined Pullman Inc. in 1975 as its Executive Vice President and, in October 1975 he became President of its Pullman Standard Division, The Railcar Division, and later had additional responsibility for the leasing, engineering and construction areas of the company. From 1972 through 1975, he was Executive Vice President Corporate Affairs for Consumers Power Company. Mr. McDivitt joined the United States Air Force in 1951 and retired with the rank of Brigadier General in 1972. During his service with the U.S. Air Force, Mr. McDivitt was selected as an astronaut in 1962 and was Command Pilot for Gemini IV and Commander of Apollo 9 and Apollo Spacecraft Program Manager from 1969 to 1972, including Apollo 12 through 16 missions. Mr. McDivitt holds a B.S. degree in Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Michigan.
CLASS II DIRECTOR
(To be Elected)
(New Term Expires in 2009)

James M. Feigley: James M. Feigley 58, has served as President of Rock River Consulting, Inc., a defense consulting firm he founded in early May 2003 after retiring from the U.S. Marine Corps.  General Feigley served as Commander of the Marine Corps Systems Command from 1998 through 2002, where he was the executive authority on research, development, procurement, fielding and life cycle support for all Marine Corps ground combat, combat support and combat service support equipment, ordinance and systems. General Feigley served as Direct Reporting Program Manager for Advanced Amphibious Assault to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Research, Development and Acquisition Program from 1993 through 1998, during which time he was in charge of business planning, cost estimating, technical risk analyses and management, systems engineering and numerous other responsibilities.  He served as Project Manager for the Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps and Naval Sea Systems Command from 1986 through 1993, where he managed all technology base projects for ‘Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle’ and wrote all technical, financial, cost, management, risk, planning and performance documentation. General Feigley also served as a member of the United States Marine Corps from 1972 through 1986.2002. He received a BS from the University of Wisconsin-Wisconsin - Oshkosh in 1972 and graduated from the Army Logistics Management Center in 1982, the Marine Corps Command and Staff College in 1986 and the Defense Systems Management College in 1986. He currently serves as Distinguished Guest Lecturer at the Defense Acquisition University and an Associate Member of the Naval Research Advisory Committee. Mr. Feigley retired from the Marine Corps as a Brigadier General in 2002 and received many decorations and honors during his military career.
-3-

 
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERSGeorge P. Farley:  
The following information is with respect to incumbent directors in Class II and Class III of the Board of Directors who are not nominees for election at this Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
CLASS II DIRECTORS
(Term Expires in 2009)

George P. Farley,: George P. Farley, 69, a certified public accountant, has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 2004.  Mr. Farley is Chairman of our Audit Committee and also serves as a member of our Compensation Committee.  Since 1999, Mr. Farley has operated a consulting practice in which he assists and advises public and private companies in complex financial transactions, on complex accounting and reporting issues and at time providing Chief Financial Officer services.  Mr. Farley has been providing financial consulting services since 1999.  Through 2006,2007, Mr. Farley served as a Director and a member of the Audit Committee of iCad, Inc. He has also served as a Director and member of the Audit Committee of Preserver Insurance Company, Inc. and Acorn Holdings Corp and as a Director for Olympia Leather Company, Inc. From November 1997 to August 1999, Mr. Farley was a Chief Financial Officer of Talk.com, Inc., which provides telecommunication services. Mr. Farley was also a director of Talk.com, Inc. Mr. Farley joined BDO Seidman,USA, LLP in 1962 and was a partner at BDO Seidman,USA, LLP from 1972 to 1995, with extensive experience in accounting, auditingwhere he served as the managing partner of BDO’s Philadelphia Office, National Director of Mergers and SEC matters.Acquisition and established BDO’s valuation practice.
 
CLASS III DIRECTORS
(Term Expires in 2008)2013)

James K. Harlan:  James K. Harlan 56, has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 2004.  Mr. Harlan is the Chairman of our Compensation Committee and serves as a member of our Audit Committee.  Mr. Harlan is thefounded HNG Storage, an underground natural gas storage development and operations enterprise, in 1992, and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HNG Storage, LP, a natural gas storage developmentfrom 1998 to 2007.  This company acquired, developed and operations businessoperated several projects that he helped found in 1992.were sold to major energy companies.  From 1991 to 1997, Mr. Harlan served as Group Development Manager for the Pacific Resources Group based in Indonesia, which was engaged with various manufacturing and distribution businesses and joint ventures in Asia, Australia, and North America.  He alsoMr. Harlan has expertise in energy technology and markets having served as operations research and planning analyst for the White House Office of Energy Policy and Planning from 1977 to 1978, the Department of Energy from 1978 to 1981, and U.S.U. S. Synthetic Fuels Corporation from 1981 to 1984.  He has a PhD in Public Policy with an operations research dissertation from Harvard University and a BS in Chemical Engineering from Washington University in St. Louis.  Mr. Harlan iswas a member of the Board of Directors of iCAD, whereserving on board audit and compensation committees from 2000 until 2008, when he became a candidate for U. S. Congress from Louisiana.  Mr. Harlan is a membercurrently chief executive of the Audit CommitteeVendevco group of companies with interests in oil/gas production, property and is Chairman ofventure development in the Governance Committee.United States and internationally.  He also serves on the advisory committee for Washington University’s International Center for Advanced and Renewable Energy and Sustainability.
 
David C. Hurley: David C. Hurley, 67, has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 2004, serves as a member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and served as the independent Chairman of our Board from March 2006 until December 2007. Mr. Hurley was appointed Vice Chairman of PrivatAir of Geneva, Switzerland on February 1, 2003, relinquishing the role of Chief Executive Officer, a position he held following the acquisition of Flight Services Group ("FSG") by PrivatAir in 2000.  PrivatAir has major business aviation operations in over fifteen bases in the U.S. and aircraft service operations at Le Bourget, Paris, France; Dusseldorf, Munich and Hamburg Germany; and Geneva, Switzerland. Mr. Hurley founded FSG in 1984.  FSG is one of the world's largest providers of corporate aircraft management, executive charter and aircraft sales and acquisitions in the U.S. Mr. Hurley has over 30 years experience in marketing and sales in the aerospace and telecommunications industries. Before founding FSG, he served as the Senior Vice President of Domestic and International Sales for Canadair Challenger. He also served as Regional Manager of the Cessna Aircraft Company and as Director of Marketing, Government and Military Products Division, for the Harris Intertype Corporation. Mr. Hurley serves as the Chairman of the Board of the Smithsonian Institution' s National Air and Space Museum, Washington, D.C.; and serves on the Boards of BE Aerospace, Inc., a public company, Hexcel Corp., a public company listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Genesee & Wyoming, Inc., a public company listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Genesis Lease, Ltd., a public company listed on the New York Stock Exchange, The Corporate Angel Network, White Plains, N.Y., and Aerosat, Inc., Manchester, NH. He is an alumnus of Hartwick College and served three years in the Special Services Branch of the US Army, receiving an honorable discharge.
-4-


The following is information with respect to the Company’s officers who are not directors or nominees for director:
 
Kenneth M. WallaceJoseph C. Hayden:  , 45,Joseph C. Hayden has been the Chief FinancialPresident since June 2010 and Principal Executive Officer since March 2006 and Secretary since February 2008.April 2009.  Mr. Wallace wasHayden also served as Chief Operating Officer from July 2006 to October 2007. From October 2005 through March 2006, Mr. Wallace was Chief Financial Officer of Crosswalk, Inc., an early-stage software and grid storage development company. From July 2004 through May 2005, Mr. Wallace was Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of a building products manufacturer based in Chandler, Arizona. From 2000 through 2004, Mr. Wallace was Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Moxtek, a scientific instrumentation company specializing in X-Ray optics and nano-structured polarization technologies. From 1996 to 2000, Mr. Wallace was Chief Financial Officer of LAB-Interlink, a high-tech laboratory automation company specializing in the remote handling of clinical laboratory specimens.
-4-

Joseph C. Hayden, 50, has been theOfficer.  Previously, he served as Executive Vice President - Programs for Applied Energetics since(since December 2004.2004), directing all new business capture and the execution of awarded contracts.  Prior to that, Mr. Haydenhe was the Executive Vice President of Business Operations from November 2002 to 2004. He is a founder of the company.
Formerly, Mr. Hayden has over 25 years experiencewas a Program Manager and Senior Principal Systems Engineer at Raytheon Missile Systems working in managing large engineering projectsthe Directed Energy Weapons and JSOW missile product lines.  From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Hayden was the Engineering Manager for Delta V Technologies, Inc., overseeing the design and manufacture of high vacuum coating systems for the commercial thin film and glass coating industries.  From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Hayden was employed by Molten Metal Technology, Inc., an environmental high technology researchstart-up company. As Director of Commercial Services for Molten Metal Technology, he led the staffing and development.start-up of three hazardous waste processing plants, including a joint venture for radioactive waste processing in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. While Director of Research and Development Operations for Molten Metal Technology, he managed the operations at the company’s R&D facility, which included a commercial-scale pilot plant. Mr. Hayden’s career began in the United States Navy, where he served as a Nuclear Surface Warfare Officer. His billets included tours on nuclear powered aircraft carriers, guided missile cruisers and destroyers, including being a member of the pre-commissioning crew of the USS George Washington (CVN-73) where he was closely involved in the testing and acceptance of the ship’s nuclear power plants. Mr. Hayden’s additional Navy tours included being a staff member of the Atlantic Fleet, an instructor and company officer at the U.S. Naval Academy, and service at the Naval Electronics Systems Command. Mr. Hayden is responsible for Contract Bidreceived a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Naval Academy.
Humberto A. Astorga:  Humberto A. Astorga has been our Chief Financial Officer since June, 2010, and Proposalsour principal financial officer and administrationprincipal accounting officer since September, 2009.  Since March 2006, Mr. Astorga has been Controller of existing contracts for Applied Energetics.  Prior to joining the foundingcompany, Mr. Astorga was Controller of Applied Energetics,Lasertel, Inc., a semi-conductor laser manufacturer he joined in June 2002.  From 2001 through June 2002, Mr. Hayden workedAstorga was senior financial analyst of NCS Pearson, Inc., a provider of educational assessments, products, services and solutions.  Prior to joining NCS Pearson, Mr. Astorga was the SAP Business Analyst for Leoni Wiring Systems, Inc., a global supplier of wires, cables and wiring systems.  From 1997 until he joined Leoni Wiring in 2000, Mr. Astorga was a senior financial analyst for the Chamberlain Group, Inc., a consumer electronics manufacturing company. Mr. Astorga is a graduate of Eller College at Raytheon, Inc. (“Raytheon”)University of Arizona and alsohe received an M.B.A. from University of Phoenix.
Eric F. Lau:  Eric F. Lau has been the Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Engineering since December, 2010.  Since July, 2009, Mr. Lau served as Director of Engineering and Operations.  From December 2002 to July 2009, Mr. Lau was a Program Manager for the Laser Guided Energy (LGE) and Counter-IED (CIED) Programs.  Prior to joining the company in December, 2002, Mr. Lau was the Vice President of Operations for Mission Viejo S. A. de C. V. from 1998 through 2002.  From 1994 to 1998, Mr. Lau was the New Product Development Team Leader for P. L. Porter Company.  From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Lau was a Senior Project Engineer at two other start-up companies. ARobertshaw Controls, Co. and from 1986 to 1991, Mr. Lau was a Project and Design Engineer at ITT General Controls.  Mr. Lau is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, Mr. Hayden wasUniversity of Southern California, where he received a U.S. Navy Surface Warfare Officer and Nuclear Engineer before leaving the service to workBachelor’s Degree in industry.Mechanical Engineering.
 
Stephen W. McCahon, 48, has been the Executive Vice President - Engineering for Applied Energetics since November 2002. Dr. McCahon has an extensive background in optical physics, solid-state physics, ultra-short pulse lasers and non-linear optics, and a broad background in Electrical Engineering (BSEE, MSEE, PH.D. EE/Physics). Dr. McCahon has more than 40 scientific publications and holds 10 issued patents with 3 pending. Prior to joining Applied Energetics, Dr. McCahon had been Chief Engineer of Raytheon’s Directed Energy Weapon Product Line. Previously, he had been a Member of the Research Staff at Hughes Research Laboratories in Malibu, CA (currently known as HRL Laboratories).
STOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE
 
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock, based on information provided by the persons named below in publicly available filings, as of the Record Date:record date:
 
 ·each of the our directors and executive officers;
 
 ·all directors and executive officers of ours as a group; and
 
 ·each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock.
 
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial ownerofficer and director is in care of Applied Energetics, 3590 East Columbia Street, Tucson, Arizona 85714. Unless otherwise indicated, the Company believes that all persons named in the following table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own.
-5-

 
For purposes of this table, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the securities if that person has the right to acquire such securities within 60 days of the Record Date upon the exercise of options or warrants. In determining the percentage ownership of the persons in the table below, we assumed in each case that the person exercised all options and warrants which are currently held by that person and which are exercisable within such 60 day period, but that options and warrants held by all other persons were not exercised, and based the percentage ownership on 80,587,76291,371,192 shares outstanding on the Record Date.  Restricted stock units which were granted February 28, 2011, do not begin vesting until the third business day following the dates on which we file our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ending December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Therefore, they are not included in the table below.
-5-

  Number of Shares Beneficially   Percentage of Shares 
Name of Beneficial Owner Owned (1)   Beneficially Owned (1) 
State of Wisconsin Investment Board
  9,048,5702   9.9%
Superius Securities Group Inc.         
Profit Sharing Plan  8,535,9973   9.3%
Joseph C. Hayden  5,604,468    6.1%
Artis Capital Management, L.P.  5,070,1614   5.5%
James M. Feigley  533,6975   * 
Eric F. Lau  405,4186   * 
Humberto A. Astorga  292,5167   * 
James K. Harlan  255,6158   * 
Mark J. Lister  125,0009   * 
John F. Levy  87,50010   * 
George P. Farley  0   11   * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)
  7,334,212    7.9%
 
 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
 
Percentage of Shares
Beneficially Owned(1)
Robert Howard 
15,339,162(2)
 19.0%
Artis Capital Management, L.P. 
8,426,638(3)
 10.5%
Thomas C. Dearmin 
6,647,351(4)
 8.2%
Galleon Management L.P. 
6,010,817(5)
 7.5%
Joseph C. Hayden 
5,994,468(6)
 7.4%
Stephen W. McCahon 
5,873,968(7)
 7.3%
S.A.C. Capital Advisors, LLC 
5,480,000(8)
 6.8%
Dana A. Marshall 
596,196(9)
 *
Kenneth M. Wallace 
470,227(10)
 *
James A. McDivitt 
318,871(11)
 *
David C. Hurley 
318,784(12)
 *
James K. Harlan 
295,615(13)
 *
George P. Farley 
185,000(14)
 *
All directors and officers as a group (8 persons) 14,053,129 17.1%
____________
** Less than 1%
 
 (1)Computed based upon the total number of shares of common stock, restricted shares of common stock and shares of common stock underlying options held by that person that are exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.
 (2)Based on information contained in a report on Schedule 13D13G filed with the SEC on January 15, 2008. Represents: (i) 13,005,162 shares of common stock held directly by Mr. Howard; (ii) 2,334,000 shares of common stock held by the Robert Howard Family Foundation (the “Foundation”). Mr. Howard is a director of, and shares voting and dispositive power over the shares of common stock held by the Foundation. Mr. Howard disclaims beneficial ownershipFebruary 14, 2011.  The address of the sharesState of common stock held by the Foundation.Wisconsin Investment Board is P. O. Box 7842, Madison, WI 53707.
 (3)Based on information contained in a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on October 29, 2009.  The address of Superius Securities Group Inc. Profit Sharing Plan is 94 Grand Ave., Englewood, NJ  07631.
(4)Based on information contained in a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2008:2011:  The address of Artis Capital Management, LLC (“Artis”) is One Market Plaza, SpearSteuart Street Tower, Suite 1700,2700, San Francisco, CA 94105.  Artis is a registered investment adviser and is the investment adviser of investment funds that hold the company’s stock for the benefit of the investors in those funds, including Artis Technology 2X Ltd (“2X”).funds.  Artis Inc. is the general partner of Artis. Stuart L. Peterson is the president of Artis Inc. and the controlling owner of Artis and Artis Inc.  Each of Artis, Artis Inc., and Mr. Peterson disclaims beneficial ownership of the Stock, except to the extent of its or his pecuniary interest therein. 2X disclaims that it is, the beneficial owner as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Act of 1933 of any of such shares of common stock.
(4)Based on information provided by Mr. Dearmin on February 11, 2008.
 (5)Based on information contained in a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2008 which indicates sole votingRepresents 103,697 shares of common stock and investment power as to the shares430,000 options exercisable within 60 days of Record Date.
 (6)Represents 5,925,66835,084 shares of common stock and 45,000 unvested shares370,334 options exercisable within 60 days of restricted common stock.Record Date.
 (7)Represents 5,828,96834,516 shares of common stock and 45,000 unvested shares258,000 options exercisable within 60 days of restricted common stock.Record Date.
 (8)Based on information contained in a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2008: The addressRepresents 64,365 shares of S.A.C. Capital Advisors, LLC, 72 Cummings Point Road, Stamford, CT 06902. Pursuant to investment agreements, eachcommon stock and 191,250 options exercisable within 60 days of S.A.C. Capital Advisors LLC (“SAC Capital Advisors”) and S.A.C. Capital Management LLC (“SAC Capital Management”) share all investment and voting power with respect to the securities held by SAC Capital Associates LLC (SAC Associates”). Steven A. Cohen controls each of SAC Capital Advisors and SAC Capital Management. By reason of the provisions of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, each of SAC Capital Advisors, SAC Capital Management and Mr. Cohen may be deemed to own beneficially 5,480,000 shares. Each of SAC Capital Advisors, SAC Capital Management and Mr. Cohen disclaim beneficial ownership of any of the securities described in this footnote.Record Date.
-6-

 (9)Represents 56,61275,000 shares of common stock 206,250 unvested shares of restricted common stock and 333,33450,000 options exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.
 (10)Represents 16,89337,500 shares of common stock 98,334 unvested shares of restricted common stock and 355,00050,000 options exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.
 (11)Represents 33,871 shares of common stock and 285,000 options exercisable within 60 daysMr. Farley denies beneficial ownership of the Record Date.common shares and common shares issuable upon exercise of options he transferred to various LLCs.
 
(12)Represents 33,784 shares of common stock and 285,000 options exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.
-6-

 
(13)Represents 23,115 shares of common stock and 272,500 options exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.
(14)Represents 185,000 options exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date. Mr. Farley denies ownership or control over common stock he transferred to a family trust.
Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance:
 
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires certain officers and directors of Applied Energetics, and any persons who own more than ten-percent of the common stock outstanding to file forms reporting their initial beneficial ownership of shares and subsequent changes in that ownership with the SEC and the NASDAQ Global Market. Officers and directors of Applied Energetics, and greater than ten-percent beneficial owners are also required to furnish us with copies of all such Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of the forms furnished to us, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 20072010 all section 16(a) filing requirements were met, except that Kenneth M. Wallace was late in filing a Form 4 and each of Joseph C. Hayden and Stephen W. McCahon was late in reporting a restricted stock grant in November 2007, but reported the transaction on a Form 5 for the year ended December 31, 2007.met.
 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
Director Independence
 
The Board has determined that General Feigley and Messrs. Hurley, Farley, Harlan and McDivitt and General FeigleyLevy meet the director independence requirements of the Marketplace Rules of the Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. applicable to NASDAQ listed companies.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board recognizes that one of its key responsibilities is to evaluate and determine its optimal leadership structure so as to provide independent oversight of management.  The Board understands that there is no single, generally accepted approach to providing Board leadership and recognizes that, depending on the circumstances, other leadership models might be appropriate.  Accordingly, the Board periodically reviews its leadership structure.
The Board currently believes that the Company and its stockholders are best served by having a Board Chairman whose duties are separate from those of the Chief Executive Officer. In March 2008,accordance with our bylaws our Board of Directors elects our Chief Executive Officer and our Board Chairman. The Chairman is selected from among the directors.
Board Oversight of Risk
The Boards role in the Company’s risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports from members of the executive management team on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, legal, regulatory, strategic, transactional and reputational risks.  The full Board receives these reports from the appropriate “risk owner” within the organization to enable it to understand our risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies.
Director Qualifications, Experience and Skills
The Board believes that it is necessary for each of the Company’s directors to possess many qualities and skills.  When searching for new candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the evolving needs of the Board and searches for candidates that fill any current or anticipated future needs.  The Board also believes that all directors must possess a considerable amount of business management and social services related experience.  The Nominating and Governance Committee considers, among other things, a candidate’s board experience, education, whether they are independent under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and the SEC rules financial expertise, integrity, financial integrity, ability to make independent and analytical inquiries, understanding of the Company’s business environment, experience in the defense industry and with government customers and knowledge about the issues affecting the Company’s current and potential markets, and willingness to devote adequate time to Board and committee duties when considering director candidates.  The Nominating and Governance Committee also focuses on issues of diversity, such as diversity of gender, race and national origin, education, professional experience and differences in viewpoints and skills.  The Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee believe that it is essential that the Board members represent diverse viewpoints.  In considering candidates for the board, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials in the context of these standards.  With respect to the nomination of continuing directors for re-election, the individual’s contributions to the Board are also considered.
All of our directors bring to our Board a wealth of executive leadership experience derived from their service as senior executives and, in many cases, founders of industry or knowledge specific consulting firms or operational businesses.  They also offer extensive public company board experience.  Each of our board members has demonstrated strong business acumen and an ability to exercise sound judgment and has a reputation for integrity, honesty and adherence to ethical standards.  When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board of Directors designated James A. McDivittto satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the company’s business and structure, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the Directors’ individual biographies set forth above and the specific individual qualifications, experience and skills as our Lead Independent Director.described below:
 
-7-

·General Feigley’s service in the United States Marine Corps and ownership and operation of a defense consulting firm provides us with invaluable insight into our government customers’ needs and requirements, as well as contacts to key personnel within these companies.
·Mr. Farley’s extensive knowledge of accounting, the capital markets, financial reporting and financial strategies from his extensive public accounting experience, and prior services as a chief financial officer of a public company and as audit committee member of several public companies.  Mr. Farley specialized in “Transactional Accounting” managing the accounting and auditing function for numerous public financings, mergers, acquisitions, reorganizations and business dispositions.  In 1993, Mr. Farley was part of the team that created a new financing vehicle, the Specified Purpose Acquisition Company “SPAC”.
·Mr. Harlan’s service in senior executive positions in manufacturing and operations provide our Board with a wealth of knowledge for these aspects of our business.  Mr. Harlan has significant experience with management and commercial issues associated with technology based businesses that comprise an important aspect of our business position.  Mr. Harlan also has prior experience in serving on the compensation committee of other public companies.
·Mr. Levy’s extensive knowledge of accounting, the capital markets, corporate governance, corporate compliance, financial reporting and financial strategies from his public accounting firm experience and service as chief financial officer and audit committee member of several public companies, as well as through the services he provides to public companies through Board Advisory Services, a consulting firm he founded.
·Mr. Lister’s broad perspective regarding our customers, markets and bringing defense industry applications to market gained through the services provided by his consulting firm to customers in the Defense, Intelligence and Homeland Security Government markets, as well as from his current and previous positions with the Navy Advisory Panel and Navel Research Advisory Committee and senior assignment with the U.S. Air Force Office of Space Systems.
Board Meetings
 
During the last year, the Board of Directors held 4eleven (11) meetings. Each of the directors is encouraged to attend meetings scheduled and all of the directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of the committees ofon which he served.served in the aggregate.  The Board also took action by unanimous written consent in lieu of meetings.
 
Committees of the Board of Directors
 
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is currently comprised of Messrs. Farley, Harlan and McDivitt.Levy. The Audit Committee is comprised entirely of non-employee directors, each of whom has been determined to be “independent” as defined by the rules of The Nasdaq Stock MarketMarket.  The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is included in this statementfiled as appendix A.an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors by providing oversight of the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company, appoints the independent registered public accountants,accounting firm, reviews with the registered independent registered public accountantsaccounting firm the scope and results of the audit engagement, approves professional services provided by the independent registered public accountants,accounting firm, reviews the independence of the independent registered public accountants,accounting firm, considers the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviews the adequacy of internal accounting controls.  The Audit Committee met 5four times during the last fiscal year.  The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Farley, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, and an independent Director, has been designated the audit committee financial expert under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is currently comprised of Messrs. Harlan Farley and McDivitt.Farley. The Compensation Committee is comprised of non-employee directors, each of whom is “independent” as defined by the rules applicable to Nasdaq-traded issuers. The Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which was filed withas an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 10-K Annual Report.2010.  The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and maintaining executive compensation practices designed to enhance Company profitability and enhance long-term shareholderstockholder value. The Compensation Committee met 6three times during the last fiscal year.  Throughout the year, the committee also took actions by unanimous written consent in lieu of meetings.
-7--8-

 
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. HurleyGeneral Feigley and McDivitt.Mr. Levy. The Committee is comprised of non-employee directors, each of whom is “independent” as defined by the rules applicable to Nasdaq-traded issuers. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for establishing and maintaining corporate governance practices designed to aid the long-term success of Applied Energetics and effectively enhance and protect shareholderstockholder value. The Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which was filed withas an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 10-K Annual Report.2010.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met 2 timesdid not meet during the last fiscal year (withinyear.  However, the Committee also met within the executive session of regularly scheduled board meetings).meetings during the last fiscal year. Throughout the year, the committee from time to time discussed various matters.
 
StrategicPlanningCommittee. The Strategic Planning Committee is comprised of Messrs. Lister (Chairman), Feigley and Levy.  The Committee is responsible for providing oversight to establish strategic direction for the Company, develop with Company management and recommend to the Board a short- and long-term strategic plan for the Company, periodically review and update the plan, investigate and review merger, acquisition, joint venture and other business combination and strategic opportunities and to provide oversight for monitoring and executing strategies.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
 
Applied Energetics has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of Applied Energetics’ employees and directors, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Applied Energetics’ Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covers all areas of professional conduct including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, disclosure obligations, insider trading, confidential information, as well as compliance with all laws, rules and regulations applicable to Applied Energetics’ business.
 
Upon request made to us in writing at the following address, our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct will be provided without charge:
 
Applied Energetics, Inc.
Attn: Human Resources
3590 E Columbia St.
Tucson, AZ 85714

Communications with the Board
 
The Board of Directors has established a process for stockholders to send communications to the Board of Directors. Stockholders may communicate with the Board of Directors individually or as a group by writing to: The Board of Directors of Applied Energetics, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 3590 East Columbia Street, Tucson, Arizona 85714. Stockholders should identify their communication as being from a stockholder of the Company. The Corporate Secretary may require reasonable evidence that the communication or other submission is made by a stockholder of the Company before transmitting the communication to the Board of Directors.
 
Consideration of Director NomineesStockholders Recommendation of Candidates
 
Stockholders of the Company wishing to recommend director candidates to the Board of Directors must submit their recommendations in writing to the Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, 3590 East Columbia Street, Tucson, Arizona 85714.
 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board all director nominees for consideration and follow the process set forth below. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, comprised of Messrs. HurleyGeneral Feigley and McDivitt,Mr. Levy, recommended to the Board the director nominations for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consider nominees recommended by the Company’s stockholders provided that the recommendation contains sufficient information for the independent directors to assess the suitability of the candidate, including the candidate’s qualifications, name, age, business and residential address. Candidates recommended by stockholders that comply with these procedures will receive the same consideration that candidates recommended by the Committee receive. The recommendations must also state the name of the stockholder who is submitting the recommendation. In addition, it must include information regarding the recommended candidate relevant to a determination of whether the recommended candidate would be barred from being considered independent under NASD Marketplace Rule 4200, or, alternatively, a statement that the recommended candidate would not be so barred.  Each nomination is also requiredStockholders wishing to recommend candidates for the Board must provide us with certain information set forth a representation that the stockholder making the nomination is a holderin Article IV, Section 4 of record of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meetingour Bylaws and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to vote for the person or persons nominated; a description of all arrangements and understandings between the stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination was made by the stockholder; such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such stockholder asrecommended director candidate that would be required to be included in a proxy statement filedprovided pursuant to the proxy rulesRegulation 14A of the SEC had the nominee beenSecurities Act of 1934 if each candidate was nominated by the Board of Directors; and the consent of each nominee to servefor election as a director, of the Company if so elected. A nomination which does not comply with the above requirements or that is not receivedas otherwise requested by the deadline referred to below will not be considered.Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
-8--9-

 
The qualities and skills sought in prospective members of the board will be determined by the independent directors. Generally, director candidates must be qualified individuals who, if added to the Board, would provide the mix of director characteristics, experience, perspectives and skills appropriate for the Company. Criteria for selection of candidates will include, but not be limited to: (i) business and financial acumen, as determined by the committee in its discretion, (ii) qualities reflecting a proven record of accomplishment and ability to work with others, (iii) knowledge of the Company’s industry, (iv) relevant experience and knowledge of corporate governance practices, and (v) expertise in an area relevant to the Company. Such persons should not have commitments that would conflict with the time commitments of a Director of the Company.
 
Deadline and Procedures for Submitting Board Nominations
A stockholder wishing to nominate a candidate for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2009 is required to give written notice containing the required information specified above addressed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Secretary of the Company, Applied Energetics, Inc., 3590 East Columbia Street, Suite, 120, Tucson, Arizona 85714 of his or her intention to make such a nomination. The notice of nomination and other required information must be received by our corporate secretary not less than 50 nor more than 75 days prior to the meeting unless less than 65 days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, in which case the notice and other required information must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the date on which the notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or other public disclosure of the date of the meeting was made.
Litigation
In July 2006, two class action complaints were filed by George Wood and Raymond Deedon against Applied Energetics, Inc. (formerly Ionatron, Inc.) and its founders. Each of the class actions was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona and allege, among other things, violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, claiming that we issued false and misleading statements concerning the development of its counter-IED product. The court consolidated these cases, and a consolidated amended complaint was served. The action has been dismissed against Joseph C. Hayden and Stephen W. McCahon with prejudice, and is proceeding against us and the remaining defendants. We are unable to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in this matter or estimate the range of potential loss, if any. However, we intend to defend ourselves vigorously in these legal proceedings.
In September 2006, a derivative action was filed by John T. Johnasen in Arizona State Court, Pima County, against certain of our current and former officers and directors, alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. On February 1, 2008, the state court extended the stay of the derivative action until 30 days after the federal district court rules on our motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the class action described above. The parties have executed a stipulation that has not yet been approved by the court pursuant to which, among other things, this action will be stayed until the federal action described above has been concluded.
In addition, we may from time to time be involved in legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business. As of the date of this report, we have not received notice of any other legal proceedings.

-9-


EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
 
Executive Compensation Philosophy
 
Our board of directors is committed to establishing and maintaining executive compensation practices designed to support the development of the company’s capabilities and business objectives, enhance our profitability and enhance long-term shareholder value.  Toward these aims, in March 2006, our board of directors established a compensation committee.  This committee reports to the board on executive compensation matters.
 
Compensation Committee
 
Membership
 
The committee is currently comprised of threetwo independent members of the Board.  Director independence is, at a minimum, consistent with applicable rules for Nasdaq-tradedNASDAQ-traded issuers, Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.  TheCurrently, the members of the committee are James K. Harlan (chairman), and George P. Farley and James A. McDivitt.Farley.  David C. Hurley, a former director, was also a member until the end of 2010, when he resigned the Board of Directors of the company.
 
Process and procedures for considering and determining executive and director compensation.compensation:
 
Among other things, the committee has the authority and responsibility under its charter to:
 
 ·Approve our compensation philosophy.
 
 ·Formulate, evaluate, and approve compensation for our officers, as defined in Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and rules and regulations promulgated therein.
 
 ·Formulate, approve, and administer cash incentives and deferred compensation plans for executives.  Cash incentive plans are based on specific performance objectives defined in advance of approving and administering the plan.
 
 ·Oversee and approve all compensation programs involving the issuance of our stock and other equity securities.
 
 ·Review executive supplementary benefits, as well as our retirement, benefit, and special compensation programs involving significant cost to us, as necessary and appropriate.
 
 ·Review compensation for terminated executives.
·Oversee funding for all executive compensation programs.
 
 ·Review compensation practices and trends of other companies to assess the adequacy of our executive compensation programs and policies.
 
 ·Secure the services of external compensation consultants or other experts, as necessary and appropriate.  These services, as required, will be paid from usfunds provided board of directors budget.by the company.  This system is designed to ensure the independence of such external advisors.
 
 ·Approve employment contracts, severance agreements, change in control provisions, and other compensatory arrangements with our executives.
 
-10-

Role of ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer in Recommending Executive Compensation.
 
The committee makes all compensation decisions related to our named executive officers. However, our ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer regularly provides information and recommendations to the committee on the performance of the executive officers, appropriate levels and components of compensation, including equity grants as well as other information as the committee may request.
-10-

Compensation Goals
 
Our compensation policies are intended to achieve the following objectives:
 
 ·reward executives and employees for their contributions to our growth and profitability, recognize individual initiative, leadership, achievement, and other valuable contributions to our company.
 
 ·to link a portion of the compensation of officers and employees with the achievement of our overall performance goals, to ensure alignment with the our strategic direction and values, and to ensure that individual performance is directed towards the achievement of our collective goals;
 
 ·to enhance alignment of individual performance and contribution with long-term stockholder value and business objectives by providing equity awards;
 
 ·to motivate and incentivizeprovide incentives to our named executive officers and employees to continually contribute superior job performance throughout the year; and
 
 ·to obtain and retain the services of skilled employees and executives so that they will continue to contribute to and be a part of our long-term success.
 
Compensation programs and policies are reviewed and approved annually but could be adjusted more frequently if determined by the committee.  Included in this process is establishing the goals and objectives by which employee and executive compensation is determined.  Executive officers’ performance is evaluated in light of these performance goals and objectives.  The committee consults the ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer on the performance of other company executives.
 
Compensation Surveys and Compensation Consultants
 
In determining compensation levels, we review compensation levels of companies that we deem to be similar to our company regardless of their location, competitive factors to enable us to attract executives from other companies, and compensation levels that we deem appropriate to retain and motivate our executives.  From time to time, we retain the services of independent compensation consultants to review a wide variety of factors relevant to executive compensation, trends in executive compensation, and the identification of relevant peer companies.  The committee makes all determinations regarding the engagement, fees, and services of our compensation consultants, and our compensation consultants report directly to our committee.
 
Elements of Compensation
 
Compensation for our executives is generally comprised of:
 
 ·base salary which is targeted at a competitive level and used to reward superior individual job performance of each named executive officer and to encourage continued superior job performance;
 
 ·cash bonuses which are tied to specific, quantifiable and objective performance measures based on a combination of corporate and individual goals, and discretionary bonuses;goals;
 
 ·equity compensation which is based on corporate and individual performance, and discretionary equity awards;
 
 ·severance and change of control agreements; and
 
 ·other benefits plan and programs.
 
While executives have a greater of their total compensation at risk than other employees, theThe principles which serve as the basis for executive compensation practices apply to the compensation structures for all employees.  Namely, corporate and individual performance are the key factors which determine incentive compensation.
-11-

 
The committee considers each component of executive compensation in light of total compensation.  In considering adjustments to the total compensation of each named executive officer, the committee also considers the value of previous compensation, including outstanding equity grants and equity ownership.
-11-

 
Compensation paid to executive officers must be approved by our board of directors or by the committee.  The committee conducts several meetings in person or telephonically to review and consider our compensation program and policies, as well as specific elements of executive compensation.
 
Compensation Considerations
In setting compensation levels for a particular executive, the committee takes into consideration:
·the proposed compensation package as a whole
·each element of compensation individually
·the executive's past and expected future contributions to our business
·our overall company performance,
·our financial condition and prospects,
·the need to retain key employees, and
·general economic conditions.
In order to enable the company to hire and retain talented executives, the committee may determine that it is in the best interests of the company to negotiate packages that may deviate from the company's standard practices in setting the compensation for certain of its executive officers when such deviation is required by competitive or other market forces.
Base Salary
 
Base salaries for the named executive officers and other executives are determined based on market data analysis ofreviews for comparable positions in the identified compensation peer group.  A competitive base salary is provided to each executive officer to recognize the skills and experience each individual brings to the company and the performance contributions they make.  When determining the base salary for an executive, we referencerefer to a target of the base salaries of similar positions in the identified compensation peer group. Other factors are also taken into account, such as internal comparisons, individual skills and experience, length of time with the company, performance contributions and competitiveness of the marketplace.  Salaries are reviewed on an annual basis, taking into account the factors described above, and are made in connection with annual performance reviews.  The amounts of such adjustments are calculated using merit increase guidelines based on the employee's position within the relevant compensation range and the results of his or her performance review.  The recommended percentage increases are established annually and reflect the committee's assessment of appropriate salary adjustments based on competitive surveys and general economic conditions.
 
Pursuant to his employment agreement in August 2006, Mr. Marshall, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President received an annual base salary of established initially at $250,000 with a provision for annual review of compensation. After a review of Mr. Marshall’s performance and consideration of prevailing compensation levels for executive talent such as is required for the company, the committee increased Mr. Marshall’s annual base salary to $350,000, effective October 1, 2007.
In connection with his hiring and the negotiation of his compensation package in March 2006, Mr. Wallace, our Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, received an annual base salary of $190,000. In February 2007, after the initial year of service and a review of compensation levels for the CFO of similarly sized public companies, the committee increased Mr. Wallace’s annual base salary to $210,000 effective February 1, 2007. On October 24, 2007, the board approved Mr. Wallace’s employment agreement which increased Mr. Wallace’s annual base salary to $225,000.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the committee reviewed prevailing practices for compensation of professionals in similar functions as Messrs. Hayden and McCahon, who as co-founders of our company have major stock holdings. During 2006, Mr. Hayden, our Executive Vice-President of Programs and Mr. McCahon, our Executive Vice-President of Engineering, each received an annual base salary of $183,750. Effective December 3, 2007, the committee increased the annual base salaries of Messrs. McCahon and Hayden to $235,000 and $225,000, respectively.
The employment of Mr. McCommon - who had served as the company’s Vice President of Finance and Chief Accounting Officer ended in December 2007 with Mr. McCommon continuing to support the company in a consulting capacity. The employment of Mr. Walik - who had been an officer and reporting employee -- ended in January 2007.
Other than the annual base salary for Mr. Marshall,Principal Executive Officer, the levels of annual base salary were determined based on the recommendation made by the ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer and approved by the committee. Each individual’s educational qualifications, leadership skills, demonstrated knowledge and business accomplishments were also evaluated in determining base salary levels.
 
Base Equity Incentive
We provide basic equity grants as a retention incentive to our employees and managers in the form of stock options to support employees having an increasing equity stake and reward for the positive performance of the company.  These equity awards serve as an important management tool to attract and retain key individuals for the company’s success.  They also serve to provide each employee with a stake in the growth and success of the company.  Normally these options are five year options that vest over three years in equal increments, which are priced as of the date of award, or the date of commencement of employment, with the first vesting increment occurring on the first anniversary of the award.  The amount of basic equity grants options are awarded based upon the job classification of the employee, but may also reflect management assessments of an employee’s performance and contributions.  Basic equity grant options are normally awarded at the following times:
-12-

·At time of hire.
·Upon promotion, assumption of greater responsibility, an advanced degree, or other appropriate milestone for an individual.
·Annually; based on management’s assessment of the individuals performance and on the individuals job classification.
Equity Bonus
Equity bonus grants will be made in the first quarter of the calendar year to reward the employees’ achievement in the previous calendar year relative to his or her observable, measurable and quantifiable performance goals.  The overall performance of the company will also be a consideration in order to encourage team effort.
The form of equity grants for performance has not been determined, and may vary from year to year between restricted stock, restricted stock units, or stock options.
On February 23, 2011, the Compensation Committee awarded, with a grant date of February 28, 2011, restricted stock units of 23,000, 17,000 and 17,000 to Joseph C. Hayden, Humberto A. Astorga and Eric F. Lau, respectively.  The restricted stock units vest as to one-third of the shares on the third business day following the dates on which we file our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ending December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Cash Bonus
 
Our practice is to awardperiodically consider awarding cash bonuses based upon, among other things, accomplishment of key objectives and overall performance.  In addition, from time-to-time the committee may approve payment of bonuses to executives or key contributors for special accomplishment or other reasons.  These goals may include progress made in technical programsThe compensation committee is currently determined to only award cash bonuses when the company has met certain cash flow objectives based upon earnings before interest, taxes depreciation and technology and product development, improved utilization of company resources and progress in relationships with key customers and strategic alliances and financing activities and the financial results of the company.amortization expense.  Generally, the company does not disclose specific targets relating to these goals, because doing so may disclose confidential business information.
After careful consideration  No cash bonuses were granted for 2010, and the compensation committee considers the possibility of Mr. Marshall’s contributions and accomplishments during the first five months of employment, the committee awarded Mr. Marshall a $60,000 cash bonus in December 2006 which was paid in January 2007. A similar annual review was completed in November 2007. Pursuant2011 to this review which noted important progress in relationships with key customers, the company’s technical programs, and improved utilization of company resources, the committee granted a cash bonus of $125,000 to Mr. Marshall.
-12-

be remote.
 
After a review of 2006 activities in progress in a number of areas, the committee established a compensation pool of approximately $250,000 (approximately 3% of gross payroll) and requested that Mr. Marshall recommend allocations of this pool for grants -- to be reviewed and approved by the committee, to key executives and employees based on their contribution to our objectives in 2006. As a part of the incentive bonus compensation program and in appreciation of their contribution to our goals during 2006, in 2006 the committee approved awards of cash bonuses of $20,000, $10,000 and $10,000 to Messrs. Wallace, Hayden and McCahon, respectively. Additionally, the committee reviewed and approved Mr. Marshall’s recommendation to compensate employees who were scheduled to forfeit excess earned vacation time due to our policy limiting the amount of time an employee is permitted to carry forward at year end. This payout was at a rate of 75% of the employees’ standard hourly base pay. Among the employees included in this program, Messrs. Wallace, McCahon, Hayden, Dearmin and Walik received payments of approximately $2,000, $3,000, $7,000, $1,000 and $5,000, respectively.
In October 2007, the board awarded Mr. Wallace a $60,000 cash bonus in connection with the execution of his employment agreement. In November 2007, the committee granted cash bonuses of $40,000, $50,000 and $40,000 to Messrs. Wallace, Hayden and McCahon, respectively based on their contributions toward advancing individual and corporate performance objectives identified by the Chief Executive Officer and the committee.
Long-Term Incentives
During 2007, the committee undertook an effort to review equity incentives existing for key employees and executives and define a long-term equity incentive program to reinforce and align employee and executive interests with those of the company and to aid in the retention and recruitment of key employee and managerial skills important to the progress of the company.
During the third quarter of 2007, the committee, working with input from the Chief Executive Officer, reviewed the equity compensation incentive positions of key executives and employees whose past and prospective contributions to the company merited special attention. This review was examined by the committee with input from Pearl Meyer and included considerations such as past contributions and effectiveness, key skills to contribute to the forward progress of the company, and incentives for continuity with the company. Pursuant to these evaluations, the committee approved the grant of 395,000 shares of restricted stock by the company to personnel other than the Chief Executive Officer.
During the third quarter 2007, following the approval of our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan by our stockholders, the committee considered, in conjunction with the Chief Executive Officer and experts from Pearl Meyer, the definition of a long term equity compensation program that would provided incentives for recruitment and retention of employees and executives in a competitive market for sometimes specialized scientific, technical and managerial skills. Another objective for this program was to increase alignment of employee and shareholder interests across the company and provide tangible reward for progress on key performance milestones. It was determined that the long term program should be well-defined and relatively predictable to support recruitment and retention objectives and include significant elements defined in the context to the company’s annual planning and budgeting process that occurs during the fourth calendar quarter in respect of the following year. Implementation of long term incentives in the context of the planning and budgeting process supports linkage of a portion of such awards to achievement of specific performance milestones and objectives. Generally, the company does not disclose specific targets relating to these goals, because doing so may disclose confidential business information.
The long term program defined by the committee includes three major elements: (1) an annual equity grant based on a percentage of base compensation for all employees other than officers, (2) performance incentive grants to selected managerial, technical, and administrative employees at all levels with vesting of a portion of these grants keyed to achievement of objectives defined in the annual budgeting and planning process and approved by the Board Committee, and (3) special grants for specific accomplishments or contributions as determined by the Board Committee. The first and second elements of this program lead to expected grants made during the fourth quarter as part of the budgeting and planning process, while the third element may lead to grants only from time to time, if at all. Generally, the restricted stock grants under the first two elements of this program vest over three years to provide for retention and long run commitment to the success of the company and the grants under the third element vest upon the earlier of the achievement of the performance objective or five years from grant.
This program seeks to provide all employees with an equity interest in the company and its success. The opportunity to realize significant increments over base annual compensation if the company succeeds in building value for customers and stockholders is intended to support recruitment of talented professionals who are sought by larger and more businesses. The use of restricted stock grants reflects a trend in equity compensation practices following the adoption of new accounting standards for equity based compensation and the desire to provide greater equity incentives with reduced stockholder dilution while utilizing fewer shares from stockholder approved equity compensation plans that are subject to overall and annual limits. Our restricted stock grants typically vest over several years and the performance based grants subject to accelerated vesting when targets are met and revocation if performance targets are not reached within defined periods. Specific performance targets are defined in the planning and budgeting process and may include items that are company confidential and, in some cases, subject to classification or confidentiality restrictions imposed by our customers. The portion of equity compensation grants linked to performance has initially been set at a modest percentage (about 10%), but this is intended to increase over time as the scope and predictability of the companies activities in various areas increase. The initial performance targets for this newly defined long term compensation program, have a high probability of being achieved. In future years, the portion and achievement likelihood for performance compensation may be adjusted with the growth, predictability, and maturity of the company’s planning and budgeting process.
-13-

The Board Committee also reviewed the equity incentives of Mr. Marshall over the course of 2007. Upon assuming leadership of the company and pursuant to his employment agreement Mr. Marshall was awarded on August 18, 2006 an inducement stock option to purchase 800,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price equal to $6.30, the closing sale price of our common stock on August 17, 2006, which was the most recent closing price prior to the grant. These options become exercisable as to one quarter of the shares covered thereby on each of the first four year anniversaries of the date of grant and expire five years from the date of grant. We agreed to file a registration statement covering the shares issuable upon exercise of the option prior to August 18, 2007.
After consideration of the progress of the company under Mr. Marshall’s leadership, in December 2006, the committee made a determination to make an additional grant to Mr. Marshall of options to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.84, reflecting the closing sale price of our common stock on the date of grant. These options vest as to one third of the shares covered thereby on the date of grant and on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant and expire five years from the date of grant.
At the completion of Mr. Marshall’s initial year the committee considered the progress of the company and determined additional incentives were warranted for advancing the development of the company. The committee negotiated an amendment of Mr. Marshall’s employment agreement, and based on the negotiations and the forgoing factors, on October 26, 2007, the company granted to Mr. Marshall 275,000 shares of restricted common stock. This restricted stock grant vests as to 68,750 shares annually on each January 10th from 2008 through 2011.
In connection with the hiring of Mr. Wallace, the company granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $9.75 per share vesting 25,000 immediately and the remaining shares vesting in 25,000 increments annually on the anniversary date of each of the next three years. In the second quarter of 2006 the committee granted to Mr. Wallace an additional 200,000 options with an exercise price of $7.20 vesting 100,000 annually on the anniversary of the grant. In December 2006, the committee made a grant of options to Mr. Wallace to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.84, reflecting the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Pursuant to Mr. Wallace entering into an employment agreement with the company, on October 26, 2007, the committee granted Mr. Wallace 80,000 shares of restricted common stock. This restricted stock grant vests as to 26,666 shares on January 10, 2008 and 26,667 shares on each of January 10, 2009 and January 10, 2010.
On November 29, 2007, as part of the implementation of the long-term incentive program and after considering the equity compensation provided to persons in similar positions at other technology-based public companies, the committee determined to award 45,000 shares of restricted stock each to Messrs. Wallace, McCahon and Hayden. The committee determined that it was in best interest of the company and its management to provide equity compensation to Messrs. McCahon and Hayden that was based on their functional role and contributions to the company currently without material reference to equity those individuals own and based on their position as founders of the company. These restricted stock grants vest as to 13,500 shares on December 1, 2008, 2009 and 2010. Vesting of the remaining 4,500 shares awarded to each individual vest upon the achievement of certain specified performance targets.
Severance and Change in Control Agreements
 
Pursuant to Mr. Marshall’s employment agreement, as amended, if Mr. Marshall’s employment is terminated by us without “cause”, or by Mr. Marshall for “good reason”, he would receive paymentNone of his base salary and benefits for 12 months, in monthly installments. Additionally, following a change of control, all unvested stock options and restricted stock granted to Mr. Marshall will immediately vest and become exercisable for the full term of the option and all other unvested equity awards shall immediately vest. In negotiating these terms, the committee determined that it was in the best interest of the company, in light of the authority vested in the Board as a whole to determine the acceptability of any discussions or prospective transactions, to provide Mr. Marshall as CEO with incentives to support the development and completion of transactions that might lead to a change of control without concern for the impact of anyour named executives currently have such transaction to him relating to vesting of equity awards or cash compensation related to transition of employment that might occur following a change of control.
-14-

agreements.
 
Pursuant to Mr. Wallace’s employment agreement, if Mr. Wallace’s employment is terminated by us without “cause”, he would receive payment of his base salary and benefits for six months, in monthly installments. If Mr. Wallace is terminated within three months following a change of control, all unvested stock options granted to Mr. Wallace will immediately vest and become exercisable for the full term of the option and all other unvested equity awards shall immediately vest.
In conjunction with the termination of Mr. Walik’s employment in January 2007, we entered into an agreement to pay an amount approximately equivalent to six months of base salary. In conjunction with the termination of Mr. McCommon’s employment in December 2007, we entered into an agreement to pay an amount approximately equivalent to three months of base pay, in accordance with prior payroll practices, and entered into a short-term consulting agreement to facilitate a transition in personnel.
OtherOther Benefit Plans and Programs
 
Executives are eligible to participate in benefit programs designed for all of our full-time employees. These programs include a 401(K) savings plan and medical, dental, disability and life insurance programs.  We currently cover the majority of such medical, dental and insurance payments, requiring employees to pay a minor co-pay fromportion of the employee.premiums and the co-pay.  Additionally, under our 401(K) plan employees are eligible to contribute to their 401(K) accounts through payroll deductions. In 2007, we implemented an employer match benefit where we matched 50% of the employees’ 401(K) contribution up to 3% of their eligible compensation. Pursuant to his employment agreement, during 2007, Mr. Marshall received $34,799 of tax gross up related to payments of temporary living and automobile expenses.
Employment Agreements for Named Executive Officers
We have employment agreements with Dana A. Marshall, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and with Kenneth M. Wallace, our Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.
We entered into the employment agreement with Mr. Marshall on August 18, 2006, upon the commencement of his employment with our company, and we amended the agreement on October 24, 2007. Mr. Marshall’s amended employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $350,000, subject to such increases as our board may determine. The agreement provides an annual incentive bonus each calendar year of up to 50% of the base salary for the calendar year if we achieve goals and objectives established by the committee. Pursuant to the employment agreement, we also provided an inducement grant to Mr. Marshall of options to purchase 800,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.30 per share. These options become exercisable as to one quarter of the shares covered thereby on each of the first four year anniversaries of the date of grant and expire on the five years from the date of grant. Also, in accordance with the agreement, we filed a registration statement covering the shares issuable upon exercise of the option. Mr. Marshall is also eligible to receive such other cash bonuses or other compensation as may be awarded by the board during his employment including gross-up tax benefits for travel and relocation related expenses.
Pursuant to his employment agreement we agreed to pay Mr. Marshall a temporary housing allowance in an amount equal to his actual rental expense (plus an amount equal to any additional tax consequences to him for such payment, if any), up to $2,500 per month, for a period of up to two years, while he establishes a permanent residence in the Tucson, Arizona area. We also agreed to pay Mr. Marshall an automobile allowance of $1,000 per month.
Mr. Marshall’s amended employment agreement is terminable by us immediately for “cause”, or by us without cause upon 30 days prior written notice or by Mr. Marshall upon 30 days prior written notice, for any reason including “good reason”. If Mr. Marshall’s employment is terminated by us without cause, or by Mr. Marshall for good reason, he would receive payment of his base salary and benefits, in monthly installments, for 12 months. Additionally, following a change of control, all unvested stock options awarded to Mr. Marshall will immediately vest and become exercisable for the full term of the option and all other unvested equity awards shall immediately vest.
We entered into the employment agreement with Mr. Wallace on October 26, 2007. Mr. Wallace’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $225,000, subject to such increases as our board may determine. The agreement provides for a signing bonus of $60,000 and an annual incentive bonus each calendar year of up to 25% of the base salary for the employment year if we achieve goals and objectives established by the committee. Pursuant to the employment agreement, we also granted to Mr. Wallace 80,000 shares of restricted common stock. These shares vest as to 26,666 of the shares on January 10, 2008 and an additional 26,667 of the shares on each of January 10, 2009 and 2010 Mr. Wallace is also eligible to receive such other cash bonuses or other compensation as may be awarded by the board during his employment.
-15--13-

 
Mr. Wallace’s employment agreement is terminable by us immediately for “cause”, or by us without cause upon 30 days prior written notice or by Mr. Wallace upon 30 days prior written notice. If Mr. Wallace’s employment is terminated by us without cause, he would receive payment of his base salary and benefits, in monthly installments, for six months. Additionally, if Mr. Wallace is terminated within 3 months following a change of control, all unvested stock options awarded to Mr. Wallace will immediately vest and become exercisable for the full term of the option and all other unvested equity awards shall immediately vest.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLESummary Compensation Table
 
The following table discloses, for the periods presented, the compensation for the persons who served as our ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer and our three most highly compensated other executive officers (not including the Chief ExecutiveOperating Officer and Chief Financial Officer) whose total individual compensation exceeded $100,000 for the years ended December 31, 20072010, 2009 and 20062008 (the “Named Executives”).
 
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position
 
Year
 
Salary(1)
 
Bonus(2)(3)
 
Stock
Awards(4)
 
Option
Awards(5)
 
All Other
Compensation(6)
 
Total
 
Dana A. Marshall
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Assistant Secretary
  
2007
2006
 $
273,077
87,500
 $
125,000
75,000
 $
300,385
-
 $
500,666
243,108
 $
89,439
16,185
 $
1,288,567
421,793
 
                       
Kenneth M. Wallace
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Secretary
  
2007
2006
  
210,046
146,154
  
100,000
20,000
  
126,162
-
  
368,029
421,851
  
6,858
27,360
  
811,095
615,365
 
                       
Joseph C. Hayden
Executive Vice President - Programs
  
2007
2006
  
199,549
183,750
  
50,000
10,000
  
9,864
-
  
-
-
  
5,109
6,672
  
264,522
200,422
 
                       
Stephen W. McCahon
Executive Vice President - Engineering
  
2007
2006
  
200,126
183,750
  
40,000
10,000
  
13,085
-
  
-
-
  
5,459
2,962
  
258,670
196,712
 
                       
Stephen A. McCommon
Former Vice President - Finance(7)
  2007  99,403  1,000  -  32,930  33,239  166,572 
                All Other    
Name and Principal         Stock  Option  Compensation    
Position Year Salary (1)  Bonus (2)  Awards  Awards (3)   (4)  Total 
Joseph C. Hayden 2010 $222,384  $25,000  $-  $-  $5,259  $252,644 
President, principal 2009 $209,615  $-  $-  $-  $4,479  $214,094 
 executive officer 2008 $225,000  $-  $-  $-  $4,813  $229,813 
Humberto A. Astorga 2010 $142,308  $-  $-  $16,432  $2,887  $161,627 
Chief financial officer, 2009 $120,769  $22,750  $-  $61,547  $1,650  $206,716 
principal financial                          
officer, Controller 2008 $112,500  $8,000  $-  $-  $3,488  $123,988 
Eric F. Lau 2010 $140,414  $-  $-  $16,432  $4,063  $160,908 
Chief Operating Officer,                          
Vice President of                          
Engineering                          
 
(1)Mr. Marshall’s 2007Hayden’s 2010 salary reflects the increase of his base salary to $350,000$230,000 effective October 1, 2007. In August 2006, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Marshall that provided for Mr. Marshall’s employment as the company’s PresidentMarch 23, 2010 and Chief Executive Officer at an initial annual base salary of $250,000. Mr. Wallace’s 2007his 2009 salary reflects increasesthe voluntary decrease of his base salary to $210,000$200,000 effective February 1, 2007 and to $225,000 effective October 26, 2007. In March 2006, we hiredMay11, 2009.  Mr. Wallace as our Chief Financial Officer at an annual baseAstorga’s 2011 salary will reflect the increase of $190,000. Accordingly, Mr. Wallace’s and Mr. Marshall’s salaries reflect only their service for the remaining portion of calendar year 2006. Messrs. Hayden and McCahon’s 2007 salary reflect increases in their annualhis base salary to $200,000$170,000 effective MarchJanuary 3, 2011.  Mr. Astorga’s 2010 salary reflects the increase of his base salary to $150,000 effective August 2, 2010.  Mr. Astorga’s 2009 salary reflects the increase of his base salary to $137,500 effective September 1, 2007,2009 upon his appointment as Principal Financial officer from Controller of the company.  Mr. Lau’s 2010 salary reflects the increase of his base salary to $170,000 upon his appointment as Chief Operating Officer and another increase effective December 3, 2007 to $225,000 for Mr. Hayden and $235,000 for Mr. McCahon.Vice President of Engineering.
(2)Mr. Marshall’s cash bonusNot included in the above table are amounts reflecting the value of $125,000Restricted Stock Units which vested in 2007 was determined by the committee considering performance as specified2010, but were granted in is per Mr. Marshall’s employment agreement. This cash bonus was paid in January 2008. Mr. Wallace’s 2007 $100,000 cash bonus was comprisedprior years and an exercise of a $60,000 bonus paid on the execution of his employment agreement and a $40,000 bonus, paid in January 2008,an option which was granted byprior to 2010.  Please see the compensation committee as a part of a performance based review related to his contribution to meeting corporate goalstable labeled “Option Exercises and Stock Vested” on page 37 for 2007. The cash bonuses that Messrs. Hayden and McCahon received of $50,000 and $40,000, respectively, were granted by the compensation committee in consideration of their contributions to meeting goals during 2007 and prior years. These bonuses were paid in January 2008.more detail.
(3)Mr. Marshall’s bonus of $75,000 in 2006 is comprised of a $15,000 signing bonus and a $60,000 cash bonus granted by the compensation committee in December 2006 in recognition of Mr. Marshall’s accomplishments in the first five months of employment. This cash bonus was paid in January 2007. The bonuses that Messrs. Wallace, Hayden and McCahon received of $20,000, $10,000 and $10,000, respectively, were granted by the compensation committee as a performance based award considering contribution to meeting goals during 2006.
-16-

(4)The amounts included in the “Stock Awards” column represent the compensation cost recognized by the company in 2007 related to restricted stock awards, computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 9 to our 2007 Consolidated Financial Statements.
(5)The amounts included in the “Option Awards” column represent the compensation cost recognized by the companyaggregate grant date fair value in 20072010, 2009 and 20062008 related to stock option awards, computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R.FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 98 to our 20072010 Consolidated Financial Statements.
(6)(4)The 2007 amounts shown in the “All Other Compensation” column are attributable to Mr. Marshall receiving $35,260the company match expense for relocation assistance, $12,000 for automobile expenses and $34,799 “gross up” for the payment of taxes for his relocation assistance and automobile expenses.401(k) contributions.  All named executives received thean employer matchmatching benefit wherepursuant to which we match 50% of the employees’ 401(K) contribution up to 3% of their eligible compensation company contributions to their 401(K) plans, a benefit that is available to all employees.  Additionally, “All Other Compensation” includes the dollar value of life insurance premiums paid by us for all named executive officers. Mr. McCommon’s All Other Compensation includes an accrual of his severance package. The 2006 amounts shown in the “All Other Compensation” column for Messrs. Marshall and Wallace include payments for commuting costs, temporary housing assistance and relocation assistance, Mr. Marshall also received reimbursements of automotive expenses and Messrs. Wallace, McCahon and Hayden received payments in compensation for lost unused vacation time
 
(7)Represents severance payments.
-14-

 
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDSGrants of Plan-Based Awards
 
The following table discloses the grants of a plan-based award to each of the Named Executives in 2007.2010:

    
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
 
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
     
Name
 
Grant Date
 
Threshold
($)
 
Target
($)
 
Maximum
($)
 
Threshold
(#)
 
Target
(#)
 
Maximum
(#)
 
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock
(#)
 
 
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards(1)
 
Dana A. Marshall        
175,000(2)
  
175,000(2)
  -  -  -       
   
10/26/2007(3)
  -  -  -  -  -  -  275,000 $976,250 
                             
Kenneth M. Wallace     -  
56,250(4)
  
56,250(4)
  -  -  -       
   
10/26/2007(5)
  -  -  -  -  -  -  80,000 $284,000 
   
11/29/2007(6)
  -  -  -  -  4,500  4,500  40,500 $147,600 
                            
Joseph C. Hayden  
11/29/2007(6)
  -  -  -  -  4,500  4,500  40,500 $147,600 
                             
Stephen W. McCahon  
11/29/2007(6)
  -  -  -  -  4,500  4,500  40,500 $147,600 
_____________
        All Other  All Other       
        Stock  Option  
Exercise
  
Grant
 
        Awards:  Awards:  or Base  Date Fair 
     Estimated Future Payouts Under  Number  Number of  Price of  Value of 
     Equity Incentive Plan Awards  of Shares  Securities  Option  Stock 
     Threshold  Target  Maximum  of Stock  Underlying  Awards  Awards 
Name Grant Date   (#)   (#)   (#)   (#)  Options (#)  ($/Sh)   (1) 
Joseph C. Hayden
     -   -   -   -   -  $-  $- 
Humberto A. Astorga
 3/23/2010(2)  -   50,000   50,000   -   50,000  $0.60  $16,432 
Eric F. Lau 3/23/2010(2)  -   50,000   50,000       50,000  $0.60  $16,432 
 
(1)The amounts included in the “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards” column represent the full grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R.ASC 718.  The fair value of stock option awards is recognized in the income statement as non-cash, equity based compensation expense over the vesting period of the grants.  For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 98 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of our 20072010 Financial Statements.
(2)The Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards represents Mr. Marshall’s eligibilityRepresents stock option awards granted to receivethe named executive officers.  These awards have an annual incentive bonusexercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the grant date and provide value to the recipient only if the price of our common stock increases after the grant date.  There were no other performance or other market condition requirements included in each calendar yearthe terms of upthe option awards to 50% of his base salary if we achieve goals and objectives established by the compensation committee in accordance with Mr. Marshall’s employment agreement. Based on his current annual base salary of $350,000.named executive officers.
 
Employment Agreements for Named Executive Officers
We currently have no employment agreements for named executive officers.
-17--15-

 
(3)Pursuant to the amendment of Mr. Marshall’s employment agreement, on October 26, 2007, the Compensation Committee granted to Mr. Marshall 275,000 shares of restricted common stock of the company. This restricted stock vest as to 68,750 shares annually on each January 10th from 2008 through 2011.
(4)The Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards represents Mr. Wallace’s eligibility to receive an annual incentive bonus in each calendar year of up to 25% of his base salary if we achieve goals and objectives established by the Compensation Committee in accordance with Mr. Wallace’s employment agreement. Based on his current annual base salary of $225,000.
(5)Pursuant to his employment agreement, on October 26, 2007, the Compensation Committee granted to Mr. Wallace 80,000 shares of restricted common stock of the company. This restricted stock vest as to 26,666 shares on January 10, 2008 and 26,667 shares on each of January 10, 2009 and January 10, 2010.
(6)On November 29, 2007, the Compensation Committee awarded 45,000 shares of restricted stock each to Messrs. Wallace, McCahon and Hayden. The restricted stock grants vest as to 13,500 shares on December 1, 2008, 2009 and 2010. Vesting of the remaining 4,500 shares awarded to each individual vest upon the achievement of certain specified performance targets.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-ENDOutstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
 
The following table discloses unexercised options held by the Named Executives at December 31, 2007.2010:
 
  
Option Awards
 
Stock Awards
 
Name
 
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable
(#)
 
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable
(#)
 
Option Exercise Price
 
Option Expiration Date
 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares That Have Not Vested
(#)
 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value of Unearned Shares That Have Not Vested
($)(9)
 
Dana A. Marshall  200,000  
600,000(1)
 $6.30  08/18/2011       
  133,334  
66,667(2)
 $3.84  12/26/2011       
              
275,000(6)
 $786,500 
                    
Kenneth M. Wallace  50,000  
50,000(3)
 $9.75  02/13/2011       
  100,000  
100,000(4)
 $7.20  06/02/2011       
  80,000  
40,000(5)
 $3.84  12/26/2011       
              
45,000(7)
 $128,700 
              
80,000(8)
 $228,800 
                    
Joseph C. Hayden              
45,000(7)
 $128,700 
                    
Stephen W. McCahon              
45,000(7)
 $128,700 
                    
Stephen A. McCommon  6,000    $5.10  01/02/2008       
   37,500    $7.16  01/02/2008       
  9,000    $7.20  01/02/2008       
  10,000    $3.84  01/02/2008       
___________
   Option Awards Stock Awards 
  Number of  Number of           
  Securities  Securities           
  Underlying  Underlying      Number of  Market Value 
  Unexercised  Unexercised  Option Option shares of stock  of Shares of 
  Options Exercisable  Options  Exercise Expiration that have not  stock that have 
Name (#)  Unexercisable (#)  Price Date vested  not vested 
Joseph C. Hayden  -   -       -  $- 
   58,000(1)  -  $0.50 03/09/2012  -  $- 
Humberto A. Astorga  83,333(2)  83,334(2) $0.40 07/16/2014  -  $- 
   16,667(3)  33,333(3) $0.60 03/23/2015  -  $- 
   -   -        3,375(4) $2,869 
   69,500(5)  -  $0.50 03/09/2012  -  $- 
Eric F. Lau  
  17,500(6)  -  $0.50 
03/09/2012
  -  $- 
   166,666(7)  83,334(7) $0.40 07/16/2014  -  $- 
   16,667(8)  33,333(8) $0.60 03/23/2015  -  $- 
 
(1)Vest
Pursuant to an exchange offer (the “Exchange Offer”) made in three installments of 200,000March 2009 to all employees and directors with respect to all then outstanding options granted under our 2004 Stock Incentive Plans, Mr. Astorga exchanged options to purchase 116,000 shares of common stock on August 18, 2008,in March 2009 for options to purchase 58,000 of common stock exercisable at $0.50 per share.  The options received in the Exchange Offer vested immediately and 2010.are exercisable over a three year period from the date of the exchange. These options were granted under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.
(2)VestVested as to 83,333 shares on December 26, 2008.each of July 16, 2009 and 2010.  Vests as to the remaining 83,334 shares on the third day following the filing of the second quarter form 10-Q in 2011.  These options were granted under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
(3)Vest in two installments of 25,000Vested as to 16,667 shares of common stock on March 20, 200823, 2010 and 2009.vests annually on each of March 23, 2011 and 2012. These options were granted under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
(4)Vest on June 2, 2008.
-18-

(5)Vest on December 26, 2008.
(6)Restricted stock grant vested as to 68,750 shares on January 10, 2008 and as to an additional 68,750 shares annually on January 10, 2009, 2010, and 2011.
(7)Restricted stock grant vests as to 13,500 shares annually on December 1, 2008, 2009 and 2010. Vesting of the remaining 4,500 shares awarded to each individual2012, but will vest earlier upon the achievement of certain specified performance targets.
(5)Pursuant to the Exchange Offer, Mr. Lau exchanged options to purchase 139,000 shares of common stock for options to purchase 69,500 of common stock exercisable at $0.50 per share.  The options received in the Exchange Offer vested immediately and are exercisable over a three year period from the date of the exchange.  These options were granted under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.
(6)Vested on April 23, 2009.  These options were granted under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
(7)Vested as to 83,333 shares on each of July 16, 2009 and 2010 and vests as to the remaining 83,334 shares on the third day following the filing of the second quarter form 10-Q in 2011.  These options were granted under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
(8)Restricted stock grant vested as to 26,666 sharesVested on January 10, 2008March 23, 2010 and as to an additional 26,667 sharesvests annually on each of January 10, 2009March 23, 2011 and 2010.2012.  These options were granted under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
(9)The market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested as reported in the table above is determined by multiplying the closing market price of our common stock on the last trading day of 20072010 of $2.86$0.85 by the number of shares stock that have not vested.
 
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROLPayments upon Termination or Change-In-Control
 
Mr. Marshall’s amended employment agreement provides that if we terminate Mr. Marshall’s employment without cause,There are no termination or if Mr. Marshall terminates his employment for “good reason”, Mr. Marshall will receive an amount equal to his base salary thenchange in effect for a period of 12 months plus the pro rata portion of any incentive bonus earnedcontrol agreements in any employment year through the date of his termination. If Mr. Marshall’s employment is terminated by us for cause, he would receive his base salary through the date of termination and all expenses and accrued benefits rising prior to such termination. Following a change of control, all unvested stock options awarded to Mr. Marshall will immediately vest and become exercisable for the full term of the option and all other unvested equity awards shall immediately vest.place.
 
Mr. Wallace’s employment agreement provides that if Mr. Wallace is terminated by us without cause, he would receive payment of his base salary and benefits, in monthly installments, for six months. Additionally, if Mr. Wallace is terminated within 3 months following a change of control, all unvested stock options awarded to Mr. Wallace will immediately vest and become exercisable for the full term of the option and all other unvested equity awards shall immediately vest.
-16-

 
A Rights Agreement commonly known as a "poison pill", currently exists which provides that in the event an individual or entity becomes a beneficial holder of 12% or more of the shares of our capital stock, without the approval of the Board of Directors other stockholders of the company shall have the right to purchase shares of our (or in some cases, the acquirer’s) common stock from the company at 50% of its then market value.
In the event of a change-in-controlOption Exercises and at the discretion of the Board of Directors, option awards granted under our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan which have been outstanding for at least one year may become exercisable in full until it expires pursuant to its terms and all restrictions contained in Restricted Stock awards granted under the Plans may lapse and the shares of stock subject to such awards shall be distributed to the Participant.Vested
 
The following table sets forthdiscloses option exercises by the potential post-employment, or change in control, payments that would be made to our executive officers by us assuming their employment was terminated, orNamed Executives and amount of stock vested on behalf of the change of control, occurred on December 31, 2007 based on their salaries and annual incentive compensation payments contained in their employment agreementsNamed Executives at December 31, 2007.
Executive Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Name
Without
Cause
Termination
For Good
Reason
Resignation
For Cause
Termination or
Voluntary
Resignation
Change in
Control(1)
Termination
Following
Change in
Control(1)(2)
Dana A. Marshall$
525,000(3)
$
525,000(3)
-$
786,500(4)
$
1,311,500(5)
Kenneth M. Wallace
140,625(6)
---
498,125(7)

___________
(1)The value of vested options as of December 31, 2007 is zero as our closing price was less than the exercise price of such options.
2010:
 
-19-

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
        Number of    
  Number of Shares     Shares  Value 
  Acquired on  Value Realized on  Acquired on  Realized on 
Name Exercise (#)  Exercise ($)  Vesting (#)  Vesting ($) 
Joseph C. Hayden  -  $-   13,500  $10,800 
Humberto A. Astorga  83,333  $73,170   13,230  $6,684 
Eric F. Lau  -  $-   24,209  $13,367 
 
(2)Assumes an effective date of a change in control within three months prior to December 31, 2007.
(3)Consists of $350,000 base salary and $175,000 incentive bonus.
(4)Represents vesting of 275,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at the closing price of the company's common stock on December 31, 2007.
(5)Consists of $350,000 base salary, $175,000 incentive bonus and $786,500 for 275,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at the closing price of the company's common stock on December 31, 2007.
(6)Consists of $112,500 base salary and $28,125 incentive bonus.
(7)Consists of $112,500 base salary, $28,125 incentive bonus and $357,500 for 125,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at the closing price of the company's common stock on December 31, 2007.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONDirector Compensation
 
The following table discloses our director compensation for the year ended December 31, 2007:2010:
 

Name
 
Fees Earned or Paid in
Cash
 
Option Awards(1)
 
Total
David C. Hurley $100,000 
$177,000(2)
 $277,000
George P. Farley   $75,000 
$132,750(3)
 $207,750
James K. Harlan   $62,500 
$110,625(4)
 $173,125
James A. McDivitt   $50,000 
  $88,500(5)
 $138,500

___________
  Fees Earned or  Stock    
Name Paid in Cash  
Awards (1)
  Total 
David C. Hurley(2) $53,750  $33,000(3) $86,750 
George P. Farley $75,000  $45,000(4) $120,000 
James K. Harlan $55,000  $33,000(5)  $88,000 
James M. Feigley $125,000  $75,000(6) $200,000 
John F. Levy $51,250  $30,000(7) $81,250 
Mark J. Lister $125,000(8) $60,000(9) $185,000 
 
(1)The amounts included in the “Option“Stock Awards” column represent the compensation cost recognized by the companyaggregate grant date fair value in 20072010 related to stock optionshare awards to directors, computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R.FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 98 to our 20072010 Consolidated Financial Statements. All optionsawards granted to directors in 20072010 vested immediately and becameshares were immediately exercisable upon grant.issued.
(2)Mr. Hurley resigned as a director effective December 31, 2010.
(3)Mr. Hurley was granted options to purchase 100,00055,000 shares of common stock in January 2007March 2010 with a grant date fairmarket value computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, of $177,000$33,000, which was recognized in 20072010 for financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with SFAS 123R. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Hurley had options to purchase 275,000 shares of common stock outstanding.FASB ASC Topic 718.
(3)(4)Mr. Farley was granted options to purchase 75,000 shares of common stock in January 2007March 2010 with a grant date fairmarket value computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, of $132,750$45,000 which was recognized in 20072010 for financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with SFAS 123R. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Farley had options to purchase 175,000 shares of common stock outstanding.FASB ASC Topic 718.
(4)(5)Mr. Harlan was granted options to purchase 62,50055,000 shares of common stock in January 2007March 2010 with a grant date fairmarket value computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, of $110,625$33,000, which was recognized in 20072010 for financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with SFAS 123R. As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Harlan had options to purchase 262,500 shares of common stock outstanding.FASB ASC Topic 718.
(5)(6)Mr. McDivittFeigley was granted options to purchase 50,000125,000 shares of common stock in January 2007March 2010 with a grant date fairmarket value computed in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, of $88,500$75,000 which was recognized in 20072010 for financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with SFAS 123R. As of December 31, 2007, FASB ASC Topic 718.
(7)Mr. McDivitt had options to purchase 250,000Levy was granted 50,000 shares of common stock outstanding.in March 2010 with a market value of $30,000, which was recognized in 2010 for financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(8)Includes $25,000 of additional director’s fees awarded and paid in January 2010 for overseeing our strategic planning initiatives in 2009.
(9)Mr. Lister was granted 100,000 shares of common stock in March 2010 with a market value of $60,000, which was recognized in 2010 for financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
 
-20-

In January 2008,2010, the Board of Directors amended itsterminated the Independent Directors Compensation Program.  Pursuant toIn addition, in January of 2010, the programBoard set the annual cash compensation for independent directors as follows:  the Chairman of the Board, and/or Lead Independent Director, if his is an independent, director and, if not, the lead independent director is toshall receive $100,000$125,000 per year,year; the Chairman of the Audit Committee is toshall receive $75,000 per year,year; the Chairman of the Compensation Committee is toshall receive $62,500$55,000 per year, the Chairman of the Nominating Committee is toshall receive $55,000 per year and each other independent director is toshall receive $50,000 per year.
Also, under the program,  In addition, the Chairman of the Board is to receive a numberStrategic Planning Committee was awarded an additional payment of shares of$50,000 annually for his services in leading the our common stock equal to $100,000 divided by the closing sale price of the common stock on the date of the award, the Chairman of the Audit Committee is to receive a number of shares of the our common stock equal to $75,000 divided by the closing sale price of the common stock on the date of the award, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee is to receive a number of shares of the our common stock equal to $62,500 divided by the closing sale price of the common stock on the date of the award, the Chairman of the Nominating Committee is to receive a number of shares of the our common stock equal to $55,000 divided by the closing sale price of the common stock on the date of the award and each other independent director is to receive a number of shares of the our common stock equal to $50,000 divided by the closing sale price of the common stock on the date of the award. The stock grants under this program are automatically granted on every January 15th, or the next business day, and vest on the grant date. All of the stock granted to the directors in 2008 vested immediately upon grant.corporation’s strategic planning initiatives.
 
Additionally, under the program, on January 15th of each year (or on the first business day thereafter if January 15th is not a business day), each independent director is to receive options to purchase 10,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock. The exercise price of such options shall be the closing sale price of our common stock on the date of grant.
-17-

 
Under the program, if at anytime during an independent director serves in more than one position of Chairman of the Board, lead independent director and Chairman of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee, that director shall receive the higher level compensation paid for any such position the director then holds. On March 13, 2008, Mr. McDivitt was appointed lead independent director and as such received a prorated adjustment in shares and cash compensation in accordance with this program. Also on March 13, 2008, upon relinquishing his role as lead independent director, Mr. Hurley’s prorated cash compensation for the balance of 2008 decreased.
Compensation Committee Interlocks And Insider Participation:COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION:
 
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007,2010, none of our executive officers served on the board of directors or the compensation committee of any other company whose executive officers also serve on our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee.
 
Compensation Committee Report:COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT:
 
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and, based on this review and these discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Applied Energetics’ annual report on Form 10-K.
 
James K. Harlan
George P. Farley
James A. McDivitt
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE:
 
TransactionsTransactions With Related Parties
 
On February 6, 2008,December 22, 2010, we entered intoengaged Mark Lister, a purchase agreementdirector of the Company, to purchase from Columbia Tucson, LLC (“CT”) the property located at 3590 East Columbia Street,perform consulting services for a period commencing on January 3, 2011 through March 3, 2011 to assist us with our strategic plans.  Mr. Lister agreed to relocate to Tucson, Arizona whichduring this period and we previously leased from CT (the “Property”). The purchase priceagreed to pay to him a consulting fee of $3,000 per day, not to exceed an aggregate of $100,000 and to reimburse him for reasonable and out-of-pocket expenses incurred during the Propertyperiod of service.  Mr. Lister was paid $99,000 in consulting fees and approximately $2.2 million. Joseph Hayden and Steven McCahon, executive officers, Robert Howard and Thomas Dearmin, principal stockholders and former executive$15,000 in reimbursable expenses.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
Pursuant to our Code of Business Conduct, all officers and directors another former executive officer and certainof the Company who have, or whose immediate family members have, any direct or indirect financial or other participation in any business that supplies goods or services to Applied Energetics, are required to notify our Compliance Officer, who will review the proposed transaction and notify the Audit Committee of Mr. Howard own allour Board of the membership interestsDirectors for review and action as it sees fit, including, if necessary, approval by our Board of CT. During 2007 and 2008, we paid rent of approximately $336,000 and $39,000, respectively to CT for the use of this facility.
-21-

Directors.
 
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
PrincipalPrincipal Accountant Fees and Services
 
The following is a summary of the fees billed to the company by BDO Seidman,USA, LLP  for professional services rendered for the years ended December 31, 20072010 and 2006:2009:
 
2007
 
2006
 
2010
  
2009
 
Audit Fees$531,540 $541,340 $326,500  $239,000 
Tax Fees  $10,875   $14,850 $46,500  $12,000 

Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit of the company and its subsidiaries, the review of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and, in 2010, the internal control evaluation under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Audit fees also include review of private placements, registration statements and offering documents in 2006. Tax fees include tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning related to federal and state tax matters.
 
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
 
Consistent with the SEC requirements regarding auditor independence, our Audit Committee has adopted a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, the Audit Committee must approve non-audit services prior to the commencement of the specified service. Our independent registered public accounting firm, BDO Seidman,USA, LLP, have verified, and will verify annually, to our Audit Committee that they have not performed, and will not perform any prohibited non-audit service.

-18-

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The responsibilities of the audit committee are to assist the board of directors in fulfilling the board’s oversight responsibilities with respect to (i) the integrity of the company’s financial statements; (ii) the system of internal control over financial reporting; (iii) the performance, qualifications and independence of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm; (iv) the company’s internal audit function and (v) compliance with the company’s ethics and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.  The committee fulfills its responsibilities through periodic meetings with our independent registered public accounting firm, internal auditors and members of our management.
Throughout the year the audit committee monitors matters related to the independence of BDO USA, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm.  As part of its monitoring activities, the committee obtained a letter from BDO USA, containing a description of all relationships between us and BDO USA.  After reviewing the letter and discussion it with management, the audit committee discussed with BDO USA’s objectivity and independence.  Based on its continued monitoring activities and year-end review, the committee has satisfied itself as to BDO USA’s independence.  BDO USA also has confirmed in its letter that, in its professional judgment, it is independent of the company within the meaning of the Federal securities laws and within the requirements of Rule 3526 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, “Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence.”
The audit committee also discussed with members of our management, our internal auditors and our independent registered public accounting firm, the quality and adequacy of our internal controls and the internal audit function’s management, organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing.  The committee reviewed with both our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope, and identification of audit risks.
The audit committee discussed and reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm all matters required by auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, including those described in SAS 114, “The Auditor’s Communication with Those Charged with Governance,” as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.  With and without management present, the committee discussed and reviewed the results of the independent registered public accounting firm’s examination of the financial statements.  The committee also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations.
The committee reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 with our management and BDO USA.  Management has the responsibility for the preparation and integrity of our financial statements and BDO USA, as our independent registered public accounting firm, has the responsibility for the examination of those statements.  Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions with management and BDO USA, the audit committee recommended to our board of directors that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Committee also reappointed BDO USA as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:
George P. Farley
James K. Harlan
John F. Levy
-19-

PROPOSAL II: RATIFICATION OF THE
APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 was BDO USA, LLP (f/k/a BDO Seidman, LLP).  The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has re-appointed BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2011, and the Board is asking stockholders to ratify that selection.  Although, current law, rules and regulations, as well as the charter of the Audit Committee, require the Audit Committee to engage, retain, and supervise the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Board considers the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm to be an important matter of stockholder concern and is submitting the selection of BDO USA, LLP for ratification by stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice.  The Audit Committee reserves the right, even after ratification by stockholders, to change the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as auditors, at any time during the 2011 fiscal year, if it deems such change to be in the best interest of the Company.  If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of BDO USA, LLP, the Audit Committee will review the Company’s relationship with BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.  A representative of BDO USA, LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Recommendation
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO USA, LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2011.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR NEXT ANNUAL MEETING
Applied Energetics currently anticipates holding its annual meeting of stockholders for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 in June 2012.
Proxy Proposals Brought Under Rule 14a-8.
Stockholders who wish to present proposals for inclusion in our notice of Annual Meeting and related proxy materials, must comply with SEC Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.  For any such proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials, our Corporate Secretary must receive it in writing no later than January 14, 2012.  If you do not follow these procedures, we will not consider your proposal for inclusion in next year’s Proxy Statement. Any such proposal should be submitted to our Corporate Secretary c/o Applied Energetics, Inc., 3590 East Columbia Street, Tucson, Arizona 85714.
Director Nominations, Proposals for Action, and Other Business Brought Before the Annual Meeting
Our bylaws require that proposals of stockholders made outside of the processes of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act must be submitted, in accordance with the requirements of the bylaws, including providing all of the information specified in the bylaws no earlier than the 75th day and not later than the 50th day prior to the meeting unless less than 65 days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, in which case, timely notice must be delivered not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the date on which the notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or other public disclosure was made. Stockholders are advised to review our bylaws, which contain additional requirements with respect to advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations.  We did not receive notice of any business proposal to be brought by a stockholder, consistent with our Bylaws, before the Annual Meeting for a vote, and, therefore, in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 14a-4(c) any proxies held by persons designated as proxies by our Board of Directors and received in respect of this Annual Meeting will be voted in the discretion of our management on such other matter which may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Our 2010 annual report to stockholders is being made available to stockholders via the Internet.  If you would like to receive printed copy of our proxy statement and annual report, you should follow the instructions for requesting such information in the notice you receive.
Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 will be provided upon written request to Applied Energetics, Inc., 3590 East Columbia Street, Tucson, Arizona 85714, Attention Corporate Secretary.  The Form 10-K also is available on our website www.appliedenergetics.com
-20-

We also file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission as required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Copies of our reports, proxy statements and other information may be inspected and copied at the Public Reference Room maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at:
Room 1580
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330.  The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding Applied Energetics.  The address of the Securities and Exchange Commission website is http://www.sec.gov.
You should rely only on the information contained in this proxy statement to vote on the proposals set forth herein.  Applied Energetics has not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from what is contained in this proxy statement.  This proxy statement is dated August 15, 2011.  You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of any date other than August 15, 2011, and neither the availability of this proxy statement via the Internet nor the mailing of this proxy statement to stockholders shall create any implication to the contrary.
OTHER INFORMATION
 
The Board of Directors is aware of no other matters, except for those incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting, that are to be presented to stockholders for formal action at the Annual Meeting. If, however, any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote the proxy in accordance with their judgment.
 
By order of the Board of Directors,

Dana A. MarshallJames M. Feigley
Chairman of the Board Chief Executive Officer and President


August 15, 2011


May 14, 2008

-22--21-







Ú   FOLD AND DETACH HERE AND READ THE REVERSE SIDE  Ú
PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD JUNE 11, 2008
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Please mark
your votes
like this
x
1.ELECTION OF CLASS I DIRECTORS:.
¨
FOR all nominees listed below (except as marked to the contrary below).
¨
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
to vote for all nominees listed below.
Dana A. Marshal (Class I)
James A. McDivitt (Class I)
General James M. Feigley (Class II)
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee,
write that nominee’s name in the space below.)
.
2. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
COMPANY ID:
PROXY NUMBER:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
SIGNATURESIGNATURE IF HELD JOINTLYDATE  , 2008

NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.




Table of Contents




Ú  FOLD AND DETACH HERE AND READ THE REVERSE SIDE  Ú

THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN ON THE REVERSE SIDE.

IF NO INSTRUCTIONS ARE GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE PROPOSALS LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.

Please mark, sign and return this proxy card promptly using the enclosed envelope.

The undersigned hereby appoints Dana A. Marshall and Kenneth M. Wallace, and each of them, Proxies, with full power of substitution in each of them, in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Applied Energetics, Inc. on Wednesday June 11, 2008, at the offices of Blank Rome LLP, 405 Lexington Avenue - 24 th Floor, New York, New York 10174, or at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, according to the number of votes that the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present, upon the following matters:

(continued and to be marked, dated and signed on reverse side)